Updated, 8:30, then, 9:30 EST, Feb. 08, 2012, again, 12:00 EST, Feb. 16; corrected as a result of new info/pictures available
It’s Madeline with the President, not Emilie
Note: the purpose of this Website is to provide true and uncompromised information without disinformation. Therefore, when errors are made, these will be promptly corrected. We at nodisinfo.com have made it our mission not to purposely or even accidentally post disinformation. Errors may be made, but at all costs must be avoided, yet purposely spreading false information is unacceptable. Even publishing erroneous information cannot be tolerated. For that reason the former post has been removed. Even so, if that information is demonstrated to be correct, it will be republished.
Right now, photos are being re-evaluated for potential manipulation. Meanwhile, it is clear and evident that the Parkers have two living children, both of them being seen in the Obama photo op.
While there is no proof that any of the Parker children died on December 14th., what is certain is that photos do exist showing three children, including Emilie. Despite the malicious corruption of certain of the Parker photographs, new information has surfaced through new and crisp photos that all three sisters. This will help clarify the question of just who were the children in the Obama photo.
Despite this, there are photos which have been clearly altered and which alterations are indisputable. That still indicates an active plot by the Sandy Hook culprits.
One of the photos presented here was apparently altered innocently by a printing-house. Therefore, it has been removed and updated with a newly found higher resolution photo.
The focus, here, is the issue of who is Emilie Parker compared to her siblings. This is to attempt to answer, once and for all, just who was found with the President on the 16th of December. Any imput in this evaluation is appreciated.
Regarding her photographs it can be readily proven that a number of them have been altered. Thus far there is definitive evidence, some of which is posted on this site, of a malicious effort to make it appear that the Parkers have three children. More thorough research needs to be done to confirm the scope of photographic alterations.
Keep in mind that it is difficult, if not often impossible, to prove a lie. Thus, in the original post errors were made. Even so, as a result of this the findings are even more curious, resulting in the finding of crystal-clear pictures of the three children. These photos can then be compared to the altered ones, another process in the continuing investigation of this immense conspiracy.
The purpose was to create imitation, or in some cases real, six-year old children to fit the profile of a schoolyard massacre. It was apparently deemed to risky to murder the children. What if the fraudsters were caught? With the tacit involvement of the White House the whole house of cards could come crumbling down. Better to fake it, not only in case it was revealed, but also because, this way, the victim trail could be created. Plus, the needed actors to dramatize the event, like Robbie Parker, Gene Rosen, Ian Hockley, Mark Barden, Chris and Lynn McDonnell, Krista Rekos, Lt. J. Paul Vance, Coroner H. Wayne Carver, III, among others, could be put in place. All such individuals were embedded and ready to go, endorsing and justifying the false story. Just why they would lie to an entire nation seems senseless beyond belief. Who can explain it?
The drama was needed to get the people’s attention and to solicit their cooperation for the plot. What good would the Sandy Hook massacre be in the parents were duds, tepid individuals who receded in their grief and sought no public presence, no interviews, no fabricated tears, and no calls for action against the bad guys and their guns.
Let us see how this was achieved. First, it is important to define the appearance of real Parker children, who are apparently Madeline
(alias Emilie) and Samantha. To do so real, unaltered pictures are necessary such as this one taken by White House photographer Pete Souza:
Make no mistake about it there are only two Parker children in this photo, the ones in pink and red. The other girls are unrelated. The boy is Jessie Lewis, son of Neil Heslin. Lewis was supposedly dead. Yet, as can be seen, here, he is obviously alive (see the previous post on this thread, titled, ”
Regardless, who is going to believe in this massacre, when two days later such photo shoots are occurring, people relaxed, children playful and smiling. Wouldn’t people, normal real people, be embarrassed at this, making a mockery of these deaths. Perhaps not every component of the corruption is known, but what is clear is that this is a scam riddled with inconsistencies and lies.
The important issue, though, is the similarity, in fact, exactness of the appearance of the living Parker girl, the one in red, with the purportedly deceased Emilie, in other words, the girl acclaimed to be Emilie in the various for public consumption pictures.
So, it is agreed, including by official White House photographers, that these are two of the Parker girls–perhaps the only two–and that the one in the center in the red and black dress is the oldest. The real age is unknown but the age of four to six is a reasonable presumption.
To find the fakery it is first important to establish the appearance of the real children, Samantha and Madeline:
Here is the same picture, side by side, with the funeral picture:
These children are the same ones hauled all the way to Ogden, Utah, for that fake funeral, Samantha in the mother’s arms, while Madeline in Robbie’s.
Now, it has been established that after December 14 the Parkers have two children, both girls. One appears to be about three- or four-years old, the other, perhaps, five.
It was this picture that raised all specters of the potential for fraud and deception. It has always been a big question: who is it that is with Obama, is this, in fact, Emilie, or is it, as advertised, Madeline, the second oldest, along with Samantha? The Madeline here looks highly similar to the Emilie Parker in family photos broadcast by the major media. It is not always the case that siblings look so similar. Often, the differences are significant. So, the perception is understandable, especially considering the contrived nature of the whole operation. Here is a picture of Emilie with Madeline from a photo album published on tinypic.com (http://oi48.tinypic.com/2n0sb9k.jpg), in order, Samantha, Emile, and the Obama-pictured girl:
You can see the similarity with Madeline of the family photo. The differences between her and Emilie are fairly obvious. The Presidential girl resembles Madeline more than Emilie. Madeline’s face is considerably broader, Emilie’s longer and thinner. Moreover, the girl being carried by Parker in the funeral would also surely be Madeline. Emilie would be considerably bigger. So, at least this case is settled. Emilie wasn’t there with the President.
Here is another way of viewing it:
Madeline on the left, according to the Parkers, Emilie on the right.
And again, this time versus Madeline
This is a more correct match. The photos have not been altered other than being sized.
Here are two close-ups of Madeline, which show the teeth:
Here are the teeth, expanded and enlarged:
Now, here is a side-by-side of two different pictures of Madeline, one as above and the Presidential one. It would appear that this is the same person. Notice the compressed nature of the two front incisors, along with the slight line-gap. In the Presidential example (right) appears to be a gap between the incisors matching the left. Thus, while no one in the media is talking about the questions being raised, including those of a conspiracy, at least this issue may well be solved: the Parker child Madeline is the same one standing in front of the President.
The bizarre KSL photo
So, with real pictures of Emilie available why is the media perpetrating a hoax, using suspect photos, such as this:
Even a single photo which is purposely altered raises suspicions, especially in a murder case, let alone a mass murder. This photo, as a real legitimate family photo, is not believable. Experts in Photoshop have already analyzed it, deeming it fraudulent. Now, keep in mind that this girl is the oldest, now at least six-years old, then, possibly four or five. An apparent Parker-endorsed Website lists the girls at one-year apart. Samantha is definitely a toddler in this photo, Madeline at least three, possibly four. That places Emilie at least at five-years old. Let’s look at Emile up close:
It’s clearly the same girl as the diminutive one in the falsified photo. They have beautiful pictures, like the one on the right, showing all three girls. Why publish this pasty version, unless they were trying to hide something? Note that this version was likely original published in the Salt Lake City area. Who uploaded this previously unknown photo? Why was it used instead of obviously correct ones, which show the children clearly and in the appropriate size?
How could this four or five-year old possibly be the same person as this in terms of her comparative size: a tiny, corrupted, Photoshopped picture indeed.
For further confirmation that the girl in the Obama picture is Madeline, not Emilie, there are the following:
Emile Obama girl (Madeline)
Emilie Obama girl (Madeline)
It is very difficult to tell but the Obama girl has tiny nostris and a circumscribed chin as well as a thickness of the brow on the right.
Here are a grouping of pictures, showing Emilie Parker on the far left.
And again, Emilie in the center:
One more time:
Here are good copies of images of the entire family together, including the previously low-resolution one posted on this site, now with a better version:
Are these family pictures real?
Experienced photoshoppers can fabricate pictures such as many of those used in this post. Notice in the Obama picture that the lighting and shadows match a real photograph, more difficult to reproduce. the background isn’t as sterile as it is in many of the Parker family phots. Here is one of the photos from the albums which is suspect.
One experienced Photoshoper worker has looked at the above photo and regards it to be manufactured. Surely, Emilie does look out of place in the photo; Alissa Parker has that same contrived apppearance found in other images.
Here are the photos he has carefully reproduced and analyzed:
It’s known in Photoshop as a clone. An identical background is used and comes up, duplicated.
Here is the final “cloned” copy. With a mere careful inspection it does look like a split of two photos, Parker with the real chilren and Alissa with an out-of-place child. There is, once again, something disturbing about Emilie’s image.
Here is his description, for now: “Definite evidence of cloning the wood grain and composing two seperate photos of the Parker parents to look like they had three girls.”
Note: these are relatively new family photos for the Parkers. They are thus being investigated for photographic integrity. They are only here at this time for purposes of clarifying just who was standing before Obama.
Note: previous post was erroneous. For those who have posted that version, please remove for the sake of accuracy. Hopefully, this update will help clarify some issues, especially the issue of just who were the children in the Obama photo-op. These may well be “good” photoshopped photos, given time a report will be issued.
It is hoped that this clarifies just who was in the presence of the President on the day after the event, December 15.