Boston Bombing — 02 May 2013
Print Friendly

Updated with new information about Director/Producer, Margie Sullivan, 5-3-13, 9:00 EST

Boston Bombing “Scissors Mole” Detected
In reviewing the Pikeman YouTube video regarding the Boston false flag bombing a discovery was made. It is the finding of what appears to a highly determined woman with a shears or scissors in hand. It is has been postulated, here, that the clothes which are shredded on purported victims of the bombing were done artificially, that is by the hands of man through prop-meisters. That postulation appears to be true.

Bostonscissors

The entire world ran away in fear of this bombing, many likely concerned that a second, third, or more bombings would occur and that they could be caught up in the trauma.

They ran away from the danger zone, an expected reaction. Not so with the bombing zone individuals: they stayed right on site to do their diabolical deeds.

The scissors meister is in no hurry to leave the scene. Rather, she is in a rush to do something else, which is to shred clothes.

Here she is with fellow collaborators. For the Zionists there was great need for a cover-up after the collapse of the Sandy Hook scam:bostonscissors32

No blast injury on these three woman: no dust, no blood, no lacerations. No blood on the white shirt of the scissors mole despite the presumed role of immediately addressing the wounded. Is that an ear piece for the lady in peach, instructions from Spielberg’s command and control center? The scissors mole is moving with great abandon and intensity. She IS accompanied by the woman in peach and the lady in dark sunglasses. According to Pikeman’s research that would appear that the lady in peach is deeply involved. The woman bears a near exact likeness to a Boston-area film director, Margie Sullivan.

sullivanprod
http://www.hcamtv.tv/biography-margie-sullivan/

margiesullivan2margiesullivan5

The likeness is sufficiently strong to raise a high degree of suspicion.

bostonscissorsfake8

It’s even higher than high. Note this:

margiesullivan8

This is the ultimate proof that the Martathon bombing was a theatrical hoax. She is now placed on the same block as the bombings: note that one of the addresses bombed was 666 Boylston Street, which would be directly across the street from her  (original finding placing Sullivan at the scene thanks to Pikeman video). Could the Zionist perpetrators make the depth of evil of their scheme (the 666 address) more clear than this?

The woman in the dark glasses behind her is also involved in directing the operation. Three women on the attack.

bostonscissorsmole2

Shears are obviously displayed. Not sure what is in her right hand. Man down in green has the same color of jacket as a man seen in the staging area as the bomb was going off.

This is an embroidery shears (spring loaded) with protected tips, just for doing the job needed to perpetrate this scam.

bostonscissorsact

Here is a cleaned-up version; again, this is highly suspect, as the use of shears to cut off clothes is not standard procedure for the general public:

bostoncleanedup

Expanded and enlarged. What looks like a shears is a shears.

bostonscissorsmle bostonscissorss

Below:

A full view of the scissors mole and all the collaborators in near proximity. For purposes of real life support that scissors would normally be the domain of paramedics, doctors, and nurses, not the lay-public. Notice a leg popping up behind the scissors mole, the leg of a man who is reportedly Jeff Bauman. This is quickly after the explosion: legs purportedly exploded off, blood everywhere, pieces of limbs, arterial spurting: problem is none of this occurred. His pants, though, appear to be sliced off at an angle. Did the scissors mole do her dirty work there already? Additionally, she is moving away from the direction of Krystle Campbell. How quickly did she get the cut job done, there?

bostonscissorsmole

Everyone runs away, but the scissors mole is here to stay, that is until all is cut and ready–for the camera shoot
bostonscissors-1

lookatthis-21

Is anything on controlled, contrived TV real? It would appear after enduring yet another vile false flag attack whatever is said on the Zionist-controlled media must be deemed false until proven otherwise.

This is surely fake and for effect. Scissors mole worked fast with those spring-loaded shears, devastating the shirt and pants, while leaving the man intact. This is fake, let the world know, make no mistake about it.

Share

About Author

drkresearch

(25) Readers Comments

  1. Wow, this Margie Sullivan is freaking awful, so different from Mary Sullivan, the proprietor of http://www.news-cottage-two.blogspot.com, who knows about how the Jews that run the American government plan to hurt her children.

    • Margie Sullivan is going to turn up suicided very soon now that she has been exposed as a traitor.

  2. This is entirely so funny to see these pathetic actors and performers do their stuff. NODISINFO.COM sure has their stuff together. This site has more street cred than cnn, msnbc, and fox have combined. MSM serious sucks because they have no credibility.

  3. You have nailed the identity of this woman. They are one and the same.

  4. I suspect that some people with sensitive hearing did have their hearing damaged by the 2 flash bangs. I suppose that’s why all the actors in the fake scene had to sign Waiver-actor Forms that hold the Government blameless. Yes, these false flags do have their dangers.

  5. Margie Sullivan is wearing ORANGE. According the FEMA-DHS name tags Key page, that means she’s an OBSERVER/VIP. Her escort is wearing PURPLE…that means she’s MEDIA.

    It all fits neatly together. You don’t have to be a Dr. Watson to figure this out. That being said, the makers of this website are doing an excellent job.

    • Can you give me the URL of the page you are referencing?

    • These look more like pliers or wire cutters to me. Pliers and wirecutters have a spring action and you hold them inside your palm, the way these are being held. You just have to squeezto get them to work, unlike the open and close of scissors. The way she’s holding the handle is not the usual configuration of the holes you put your fingers through to use scissors.
      It’s still very suspect. There’s no way pants can be shredded by high speed debris without tearing up the skin on your legs.
      Another thing I noticed is how fast everyone shows up with the distictive blue latex gloves.
      Do you carry them around all the time? I don’t

      • Good point about the shredded clothes from faster than the speed of light debris but no injuries or impaled objects.

      • There ARE scissors that are spring loaded and work by squeezing the handles together. Several examples can be found at the JoAnn Fabric website. Here’s just one example, but if you search for “scissors” there you will see a few different types of spring loaded scissors: http://www.joann.com/heritage-5-snip-with-lanyard-blue-handle/xprd357337/

        • Good point, I’ve never seen those before and they would do a fast job of shredding clothing.

    • Dougster – Please tell me where you learned about the color coding mentioned above.”Margie Sullivan is wearing ORANGE. According the, that means she’s an OBSERVER/VIP. Her escort is wearing PURPLE” THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT.
      Did you see the video of the two brothers preceeded by a woman with Yellow balloons? They were the only balloons around and could have been a good signal. The first bomb went off shortly afterward and the Craft mercs had moved off.

  6. Watch RT.Com and disconnect all mainstream State Department propaganda wings out of your TV. There’s more to come from the masters of idiot Obama!

  7. Um, I just wanna throw this out there but maybe they were nurses stationed at the finish line for medical emergencies? And despite what the author says it is indeed standard procedure to cut off the clothes of trauma victims. Yes that’s clothes, not close.

    • You are not a very good shill, and, thus, it would be a good idea for you to disappear. RE: your comment, you said:
      “maybe they were nurses stationed at the finish line for medical emergencies? And despite what the author says it is indeed standard procedure to cut off the clothes of trauma victims”

      Quoting directly quoting from the article: http://nodisinfo.comboston-scissors-mole-detected/

      Here is a cleaned-up version; again, this is highly suspect, as the use of shears to cut off clothes (typo corrected, thank you) is not standard procedure for the general public:

      A full view of the scissors mole and all the collaborators in near proximity. For purposes of real life support that scissors would normally be the domain of paramedics, doctors, and nurses, not the lay-public.

  8. Could this woman be a medical technician going to aid the injured by cutting the clothing to gain access to wounds??? Her clothing indicates that she is a medic and she is going to help the injured. Has everyone lost their minds here???? Please view these photos: WARNING, NOT FOR THE FAINT OF HEART! http://cryptome.org/2013-info/04/boston-bombs/boston-bombs.htm Use your common sense, please…..

    • Umm I am an EMT, and scissors are standard to cut off clothes near wounds, yes. These people have clearly gone off the deep end with this. Scissors Mole? LOL.

  9. this was really poorly done.

    we could really use some decent alternative media, and then we get this garbage instead.

  10. The lady looks similar but there noses are totally different….and I’m sorry but that looks like a pair of reading glasses in the other woman’s hand not scissors….sorry but if you wanna believe something bad enough you mind plays tricks on you and you see stuff that’s not really there

  11. Yeh just zoomed a high res right in and looks like reading glasses.. also look at the attached pic of when the bomb went off and where she was.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/95222051@N04/8700679398/in/photostream/lightbox/

    Dont see her shredding many items of clothes here

    • So the “Scissors mole” is now a “reading glasses mole” ? what do you do with those?

  12. Read conspiracy theories??

  13. Margie Sullivan looks nothing like the woman in the bombing photos. I hope you hear from her lawyer. You put up a lot of interesting stuff but you also seem to have quite an imagination when it comes to describing every blurry little thing you see in a photo and giving it some evil description and purpose. The whole is of course a hoax but some of your over the top statements don’t help.

  14. The whole thing is fake if we’re to believe two brothers did it on their own.

    BUSTING CAPS IN JACK
    —————————————-

    An Open Letter to Jessie “The Body”
    Ventura and Dick Russell

    Friday 24 May 2013

    Dear Govenor and Author:

    SUBJECT: BOMBER ONE

    The bomber in Boston named Tamerlan
    was a Russian double agent. An agent
    is also known as an asset. An
    operative runs or handles an agent. An
    operative is an employee of the C.i.A.
    A Russian double agent is an agent who
    the C.i.A. believes is working for it,
    but, is really being run by the
    Russians. The double agent has either
    been working for the Russians from the
    beginning or has been turned into a
    Russian agent after having been
    recruited by the C.i.A.

    In the case of the Double Agent
    Tamerlan, the C.i.A. repeated its
    mistakes of the 1950s when running
    Oswald and the other exmil agents who
    pretended to defect to the Soviet
    Union. Mark Lane has given an
    excellent disclosure of the sources and
    methods in this matter. Because of the
    high positive correlation between the
    mistakes of Oswald’s handler in the
    C.i.A. and Tamerlan’s, I wonder whether
    Tamerlan’s handler in the C.I.A. is
    himself a Russian Double Agent. In any
    case, even an ordinary person such as
    me, can recognize the pattern or to be
    more accurate, signal, that Tamerlan’s
    behaviour in South Asia displayed to
    Russia’s Intelligence.
    —————————————

    Pattern 1. Oswald and Tamerlan were
    both C.i.A. agents.

    p. 33, AMERICAN CONSPIRACIES: LIES,
    LIES, AND MORE DIRTY LIES THAT THE
    GOVERNMENT TELLS US, Jessie Ventura
    with Dick Russell, 2010, Skyhorse
    Publishing: New York (N.Y.), New York
    (N.Y.), UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
    (U.S.A.).

    “[Texas(?) District Attorney Henry]
    Wade’s source said that Oswald had a
    CIA employment number as well.”

    Someone named Russell was Tamerlan’s
    handler and the name Russell has been
    tied to the C.i.A. since the time of
    Oswald (p.609, n. 9, McMillan).

    If the C.i.A. gives its agents (assets)
    employment numbers, then we should
    easily find Tamerlan’s handler and put
    her or him in jail.
    —————————————

    Pattern 2. The C.i.A. had ties from
    the 1960s with terrorist groups which
    were assassinating Soviet politicians
    and Socialist and Communist politicians
    in other countries, such as Cuba. The
    C.i.A. now has ties to terrorist groups
    in South Asia that target Russians in
    order to drive a wedge between it and
    its former republics. The C.i.A. has
    been tied to the terrorists who carried
    out an attack in Moscow a few years ago
    which resulted in the deaths of over
    100 people attending a Russian national
    performing arts troupe. Tamerlan and
    his brother attacked an American
    national activity – The Boston Marathon
    on Patriots’ Day. The Russians sent
    us a message about an out-of-control
    C.i.A.

    http://tarpley.net/2007/09/14/russians
    -blast-us-uk-sponsorship-of-chechen
    -terror/

    In the wake of the terrorist atrocity at a
    school in Beslan, North Ossetia, in the
    Russian Federation, Russian President
    Vladimir Putin has made remarks to the
    western press which expose the key
    role of the US and British governments
    in backing Chechen terrorism.

    pp. 593, n. 4., 611 and 612, n. 2, and
    626 and 627, n. 23 MARINA AND LEE,
    Priscilla Johnson McMillan, 1977,
    Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc.: N.Y.,
    N.Y., U.S.A. (N.Y.).

    “On February 6, 1962, The New York
    Times ran a UPI story from Rome,
    citing the Italian Communist Party
    newspaper, L’Unita, which was highly
    reliable on Soviet affairs, as follows:
    “L’Unita reports today unconfirmed
    rumors circulating among Western
    correspondents in Moscow that there has
    been an attempt on Nikita S.
    Khrushchev’s life…the assassination
    was reported to have taken place at
    Minsk, on the Soviet-Polish frontier,
    two weeks ago.” I was in the Soviet
    Union the following summer and heard
    rumors about an attempt in Moscow,
    Stalingrad, Sochi, and Kislovdsk – one
    that Khrushchev was grazed on the arm
    and slightly wounded, and another that
    the bullet missed Khrushchev but hit
    the Minister of Finance, Zverev. In
    fact, Khrushchev left Minsk for Sochi,
    and did not reappear in public for
    three weeks, a very good sign that an
    attempt on his life had occured.”

    Minsk was Oswald’s stomping ground. A
    Double Agent from Minsk helping bust a
    cap in Jack Kennedy is a very good sign
    that pay-back occured. Even if the
    C.i.A. didn’t see it, I bet the Russian
    Finance Minister did the math and saw
    it.

    “In a speech on April 19, 1963,
    President Kennedy, in what was actually
    an effort to soften demands for a new
    invasion of Cuba, predicted that “in
    five years’ time” it was very likely
    Castro would no longer be the ruler of
    Cuba and, in the long run, the United
    States would be seen to have
    contributed to the result. In The
    Militant of April 29, 1963, a writer
    named William Bundy reported a
    statement by Robert Kennedy on April
    22: “We can’t just snap our fingers
    and make Castro go away. But, we can
    fight for this. We can dedicate all
    our energy and best possible brains to
    that effort.” Read from hindsight,
    with knowledge that the Kennedy
    administration was engaged in
    assassination plots against Castro,
    the two speeches, so closely timed
    together, suggest that not only
    Robert Kennedy and others high in the
    administration but also the President
    himself were aware of these plots. At
    the time, however, no one read these
    speeches in that light, the public
    question being whether there would be a
    a second U.S. invasion.”

    Here’s my take: President Obama is
    involved in assassinating foreigners
    with drones. President Obama has said
    that the President of Syria, Bashar
    Asad, must go. The C.i.A. discredited
    the Secret Service’s ability to protect
    President Obama about a year ago by
    using a classic “honey pot” in Latin
    America. The military industrial
    (and intelligence) complex doesn’t like
    President Obama for trying to keep the
    U.S. out of another war. The crazies
    in the C.i.A. are replaying the same
    failed conspiracies from the ’50s and
    60s. They’ll run a false flag attack
    in order to help Obama see the light,
    so to speak and then change his
    mind about direct U.S. involvement in
    Syria. Someone in the C.i.A. is using
    the same script from Cuba to influence
    President Obama on Syria Instead of
    keeping everything on the table
    concerning Syria, President Obama
    should put the the C.i.A. back in
    its box and then tuck it away high
    up on a shelf out of reach. Putting
    Tamerlan’s C.i.A. handler in jail would
    be a very good start.

    pp. 77-79, Ventura, 2010.

    “MY TAKE: Nixon was involved in a
    power struggle with the CIA, trying to
    pry loose what their [C.i.A.] files
    contained on the Kennedy assassination.
    He was taken down by “double agents”
    who were actually working for the CIA,
    who intentionally got themselves
    caught. Many of the Watergate cast
    track back to who killed JFK.”

    “What if it [Richard M. Nixon's
    obsession with or haunting by his and
    Clann Kennedy's closely connected
    political careers] all tracked back to
    the assassination of John F. Kennedy
    almost a decade earlier? What if the
    Watergate backstory is really about
    what Nixon knew or wanted to know,
    about who killed JFK.”

    “Maybe Nixon was determined to find out
    what the CIA possessed about the
    assassination, out of curiosity and for
    his own purposes.”

    “Let’s start with a story that H.R.
    Haldeman, Nixon’s chief of staff,
    related in his memoirs. Soon after
    taking office in 1969, the president
    called him into the Oval Office and
    officially asked Haldeman to get hold
    of any and all documents from the CIA
    that pertained to the Bay of Pigs.
    This was the first of many occasions
    that Nixon referred to that historical
    event, when the CIA sent an invasion
    force of Cuban exiles to try to
    overthrow [Fidel] Castro in April
    1961…Haldeman makes the assertion in
    his book that “in all of those Nixon
    references to the Bay of Pigs, he was
    actually referring to the Kennedy
    assassination.”

    Nixon was scared that the C.i.A. might
    find a reason to assassinate him.
    Ventura is right, the C.i.A. never
    forgets. It also knew that Nixon was a
    violent pacifist (notice the word fist
    in paci-fist) who beat his wife, Pat
    and drank too much. Neither did it
    forget what he said in 1963.

    p. 368, McMillan, 1977.

    “It was the Dallas Morning News, which
    had a banner headline that day: “Nixon
    Calls for Decision to Force Reds Out
    of Cuba.” The lead story, accompanied
    by a front-page photograph of the
    former Vice President, reported a
    speech which Richard Nixon had
    delivered the day before in Washington,
    accusing President Kennedy of being too
    soft on Castro and demanding a “command
    decision” to force the Russians out of
    Cuba. The speech could have been
    interpreted as a call for a new
    invasion.”

    If “Tricky Dick” had seen the C.i.A.
    file, then he would have found out that
    the Russians had manipulated the C.i.A.
    into shutting down its programme of
    assassinating Russian politicians and
    other anti-American politicians, by
    assassinating its own President -
    J.F.K.. Nixon would then have cleaned
    house at the C.i.A. and started
    assassinating Russians, again; some of
    whom, apparently, were very good
    friends of the C.i.A. This would have
    resulted in the C.i.A. busting a cap in
    Dick’s head; because the C.i.A. was and
    still is incapable of anything else.
    Obviously, the C.i.A. didn’t want to
    be forced to do the Russians’ dirty
    work once again.
    —————————————

    Pattern 3. The Russians are in denial
    about Tamerlan being their Double
    Agent and are using much the same
    methods as they used with Oswald and
    his Russian bride, Marina Alexandrovna
    Medvedeva. Or was it Marisha
    Nikolayevna Prusakova? How about
    Marinochka Ilya Yakovlevna? There’s
    also confusion about Tamerlan’s
    relations in Russia and South Asia.
    His Russian uncle changed his last
    name and Tamerlan’s relatives are as
    murky as Marina Lee Oswald’s.
    Then there’s the Americans named
    Russell – sounds sort like Russia.
    Could the C.I.A. be so obvious and
    stupid using Russia – Russell?
    But, unlike the C.i.A., Russian
    Intelligence has done something new.
    It notified the F.B.I. that it had
    suspicions about Tamerlan.
    This is a much more effective method
    than the cover-up using the Yury
    Nosenko defection-countre
    defection game of the early ’60s. But,
    Nosenko was a necessary part of the
    Russian message going back to the
    exmil defections-countre defections of
    the ’50s which involved Oswald.
    Nosenko had an answer for everthing.
    He had to in order to assist Russia’s
    friends in the C.i.A. Just as in
    Oswald’s case, the F.B.I. is being
    blamed for not acting on
    information about Tamerlan’s
    dangerousness.

    pp. 17, 18, 19, 29, 44, 48, 64, 65, 87,
    137-141, 146, 159, 180, 587, n. 17,
    589, n. 3., 590, n. 2, 593, n. 8, 594
    and 595, n. 11, 619, n. 9, 623, n. 12,
    624 and 625, n. 21, McMillan, 1977.
    —————————————

    HOW DID THE RUSSIANS DO IT?

    The “dangle:” Marina’s uncle.

    pp. 33 and 35, Ventura, 2010.

    Hypnosis.

    pp. 63, 64, and 71, Ventura, 2010.

    “Early in 1968, [James E.] Ray “began
    writing certain phrases over and over
    on paper. These are included in the
    F.B.I. file on the assassination.
    [Robert Kennedy's assassin] Sirhan did
    the same thing.”

    Oswald too, was a prolific writer. He
    also had a post-hypnotic suggestion.
    “In August 1964, Marina came across
    several of her husband’s possessions
    which the Secret Service had
    accidentally failed to confiscate.
    Among them was an English-Russian,
    Russian-English dictionary inscribed in
    Lee’s hand, “Lee Harvey Oswald, Hotel
    Metropole, Moscow, November 22, 1959
    (p. 620, n. 4, McMillan, 1977).”

    Oswald was programmed to add the 5 to
    the 9 and then subtract the resulting 1
    from the 4. This changed the date from
    22 November 1959 to 22 November 1963
    for when Oswald was programmed to
    take executive action. It couldn’t have
    been 1973 or 1983. Oswald knew this
    and that’s why the Russians used this
    method. Marina was either a willing or
    unwilling Russian agent. Part of her
    job was to make Lee insanely jealous by
    bringing up her former boy-friends.
    She stressed that one of them looked
    like Jack Kennedy. When Oswald busted
    a cap in Jack, he thought he was
    shooting the subject of his jealousy.
    That explains how he could admire
    Kennedy and at the same shoot him.

    Who do you believe, me, a graduate
    with honours from MK-Ultra or Nosenko?

    Sincerely,

    Eochaidh MacDhalaigh OghaChruithne

    or is it

    Ha’ashkee Dahszii Ya’ai Jii

    P.S.: I’m not a S.E.A.L. or Special
    Forces. Neither am I an Air-borne,
    Ranger, Green Beret. I never
    served in combat or over-seas. I’m a
    leg; a grunt.

Leave a Reply