Boston Bombing — 29 May 2013
Print Friendly

More Proof that Erika Brannock and Nicole Gross are Fakes

It will be proven, here, that a false identity was created to make a fake family surrounding both Erika Brannock and Nicole Gross, a condemnable act, considering that they are responsible for extorting money from the American people as a result of their good will. It will also be proven, in addition to the proof already provided by PC Geek, that in no way did Erika Brannock or Nicole Gross suffer injuries on the day of the smoke bombing. In other words, they are fakers. Evidence will also be provided of the creation of fake or virtual families by Photoshop.

The premise as a result of the investigation thus far of the Boston smoke bombing hoax is as follows: if anyone lost a leg, that happened before the Marathon. Thus, those who represent themselves as amputee victims of a mere smoke and pyrotechnic bomb are frauds. From that basic presumption precedes all investigative efforts. Let anyone prove the premise wrong.

Clearly, Brannock was not wounded by the smoke bomb. She is seen here amongst the veritable pile of actors and actresses who will fabricate their injuries:



Let’s take her at her word from the CBS interview, conducted through the Charlie Rose Show by Lee Woodruff:

It’s a photograph seen around the world that captured the horror and  of the Marathon bombing–a young woman in shock, trying to get up

She and her sister Erika Brannock were at the race to  their mom. They sat down with Lee Woodruff to share their story. it’s a story you will only see on CBS This Morning.

Woodruff: 57-year old Carol Downey had long wanted to run the Boston Marathon. Her daughters, Nicole and Erika, traveled to Boston to watch Carol. And as the day wore on the sister s at the 26 mile mark, where the banner honoring the victims of the Newtown shooting. Eager to get a better view Nicole suggested they find  a place just shy of the Finish Line. Their mom had only a half mile away. And they were standing only a few feet away from where the 1st bomb exploded.
Gross: For me personally I remember the (and she struggles, here, looking away, extreme eye lateralization) sound and remember being thrown back, and there was instant silence (no screaming and hollering; it’s on the tape), and I can remember the smell of the bomb.

nicolegross-se

Brannock: I remember everything. Slowly, and just falling back in slow motion–and everything went quiet–and, then, I was scared for dear life that another bomb was gonna go off and that’s how I was gonna die.
nicolegross-1

Woodruff: This is the picture we all saw. What did you think when you see that?

Gross: In the beginning I could only look at my face. It was too much to see the surroundings. But I remember exactly what I was going through in my head just confusion and fear.
nicolegross-lower

Woodruff: Is that how you see yourself now? (answering immediately) Yea

Brannock: That’s how she’s always been

Gross: Yup

Woodruff: You have been through a lot, all of you, as a family.
nicolegross-hearing

Gross: I broke both, um, lower legs, uh, (pause, seems confused) distal tibia, and, uh, fibula, and my left leg and then have, uh, nearly severed Achilles tendon on the right foot and just some open gashes that were closed up from the blast and (smiles) hearing loss.


She suffered the shearing off of her clothes, application of moulage, the splashing of fake paint about her body, the application of self-oozing silicon patches, and a specialized, unknown technique to create pot holes in her shirt. Let’s quote her, one more time:

I broke both, um, lower legs, uh, (pause, seems confused) distal tibia, and, uh, fibula, and my left leg and then have, uh, nearly severed Achilles tendon on the right foot and just some open gashes that were closed up from the blast…

Really?
Can’t have it both ways, can’t have medical emergencies and the application of moulage, charcoal, fake blood, silicon, and more. Those ARE artificially placed patches with self-oozing red fluid. Then, too, no wonder they self-healed from the smoke bomb: the wounds were never really there.

nicolegrosssilicon

Brannock: I have a leg amputation above the knee on my left leg, and, then, I have broken bones in my right leg. I have a big chunk of one of my bones (gets confused, here) the (someone helps her as it can be heard “fibula”) I believe it is the fibula, um, missing from my right leg. And then I have burn marks in the back of my right leg and (as if saying, Oh by the way) hearing damage.
erikabrannock-been

Narrator: Erika had multiple surgeries to save her right leg. She still faces months of rehabilitation before she’ll be able to walk with the aid of a prosthetic. A few weeks ago we were there when Nicole was released from the hospital.

Woodruff: Michael, you’ve been married 7 years. What’s it been like working her through this?

Michael Gross: It’s been tough; it’s been tough to watch someone who you love so much going through this and really not be able to fix the problem yourself. But I’ve seen a strength in her that I hadn’t seen before.

Downey: It’s hard to watch your kids be hurt.

Woodruff: Maybe you wanna take the hurt on yourself.

Downey: Oh yea, definitely, I would if I could.

Woodruff: Was there guilt at all with you guys?
nicolegross-09

Gross: There’s guilt, because Erika I close to exactly where the bomb went off, and so that’s, that’s just something that I know that some amount of guilt, um, but it’s hard, because I wish I could take everything that Erika has gone through and put it on my body.

Editor’s note: same inane heroics that were imposed upon the people at Sandy Hook. Liars and criminals they all are. While they spout their filthy corruption, this is what really happens in the world at the hands of Zionist beasts:

url-2

628x471
Caption: the spilling of real fresh blood and the murder of real humans by Zionist-orchestrated wars

Brannock: I don’t think she has any reason to feel guilty about that, because there’s no way that she could have possibly known that. She feels guilty about that, because there’s no way that she could have possibly known (you should feel guilty for being alive for what you are doing. It is hoped that you may read this post so some sense can be brought into your mind; the Zionists plots that are being thus supported are largely responsible for such brutality versus the fakes, like the Brannock, Gross, and Harlan cabal).

Woodruff: Do any of you feel any anger at all?

Brannock: um, um, I think one of the hardest things for me was when they actually brought the 2nd bomber to the hospital (Beth Israel) that I’d been at, and in a couple of days after that when I headed to go in for surgery I would pass by the ICU where he was, you know, I started having nightmares that he was gonna get out of his bed and come up to (my) room. I thought, he was gonna blow the hospital up.

Woodruff: What would you say to the brothers if you were able to talk to them right now?

Brannock: I don’t think I’d have anything to say to them (Boston-Brannock tough talk)

Editor’s Note: it is extremely easy to prove that both Gross and Brannock are lying, not merely by their facial expressions and mannerisms but also through the photographs taken on the scene.

Photographic evidence

PC Geek has pointed out that the blonde on the ground on her back is Brannock.

erikabrann13
Discovering that there was no evidence of amputation, he also found the color variation and the angular distortion demonstrating the existence of a false leg, known medically as a prosthesis. Zoomed in there appear to be other anomalies such as a kind of rectangular aspect (not ruling out a reflection) and that bizarre red area, almost patch-like. Yet, what is most importantly seen is that there is no amputation:

“I have a leg amputation above the knee on my left leg…”

Really?

erikabrannock-98r

Let someone, anyone in the world, demonstrate how this is synonymous with an actual amputation, with, as advertised a violent dissemberment of precisely this leg, this left leg above or below the knee, as a result of a shrapnel bomb. Where is the dismemberment of the already detonated bomb? Where is the arterial bleed? Where is the visible matter: the muscle, adipose tissue, remnants of the boney material? Where are the dismembered pieces of the extremity? Where’s the blood, bruising, and contusions as would be expected  from her acclaimed injuries: she claims, let it be known, to have lost a leg. How? The leg is right there. Moreover, if it’s not a real leg, as it appears not, then, the fake leg is there? Is the DHS prop-person skilled at a three-minute long drill conducting an amputation in the field, suturing, cauterizing, stemming all flow of blood, sterilizing, dressing, and then, finally, applying a prosthesis: all in a few minutes? This alone proves the entire event a scam, with Brannock a key scammer, along with all the others, piled up like the derelicts in hellfire.

fakeamputees-434

Who is Erika Brannock?

This is the trail created for this woman, where she apparently works at a child care facility managed by none other than Liz Harlan:

erikabrannock-89

erikabrannock23

It seems reasonable enough that she works here, since it is run by a woman believed to be her real sister, Liz Harlan. There are virtually never any photos showing her standing up, all legs visible. Even so, the tilt in her stance is clearly evident. She is wearing a prosthetic. Brannock is a previous amputee. Moreover, CBS can protest it all it wants. It is a definite issue that she did not lose a leg during the smoke bombing:

erikabrannock2
Yet, this was surely the case before she arrived on the scene at Boston, as demonstrated by the Boston Globe’s and other’s own photos. So, again, just who is she? Moreover, what happened to the prosthetic device she was wearing when she was lying flat on the ground? Has she admitted somewhere else prior to the event to being an amputee? Surely, there are people who know her and can affirm that her loss of limb occurred long ago. Will they do the right thing and come forward?

Hard evidence of photoshopping and more

Pictures showing her other than from the chest and/or head up are rare, that is prior to the event. Yet, here is one, along with her purported mother and a runner. Is this picture real? In other words, could the mother be fake?

http://www.trbimg.com/img-518eef43/turbine/erika-brannock-family–png-20130511/580/580×435

In fact, the picture is a fabrication, that is the creation of a virtual reality. Firstly, CBS claimed, Baltimore affiiliate News13, that the woman on the far left screen was actually Nicole Gross, which is obviously not the case. Even so, right away, it would appear that Downing is out of place, almost stiff, as if she was put into the frame. Notice the softness of the features, especially in the face. The legs of the obvious runner are defined; the others highly soft. See how Ms. Downey appears to be stiff, as if she was installed in that middle posture. What is the black component behind Brannock’s head? What about the sunglasses? Are these really a part of this image?

erikabrannphoto
The sunglasses could be real, merely distorted. However, there is other more compelling evidence. Notice the piece of white string like material crossing into the green. That could be a cut defect from the Photoshop cutting tool.  Working up, the second arrow marks an area likely representing the use of the blur tool. In front of this is a hard area of hair which makes no sense and could represent cutting and blurring. Not marked, there appears to be a cut mark on the right neck along the t-shirt line. A line of black also arises from the sunglasses plastic.

grosspphotoshop

http://www.trbimg.com/img-516e1fc9/turbine/la-na-nn-boston-marathon-erika-brannock-201304-001/600
Look: it will also be seen that the neck ghosts out on the left screen and right screen, and the background can be seen through it. In no way can this be regarded as normal. There are large stroke marks from the blur tool which are obviously visible, especially left screen, one large tool mark riding into the neck and the other as a kind of semicircle in the green background. Also, look at the neck? See the three cords? Those cords are not natural parts of the neck and are instead attached to the bony chin itself. Those cords are either brush strokes or the triplicate pattern seen as a residue of Photoshopping.

There is also great evidence of the use of the blur tool all around her head on the pavement, going in upward, curved strokes. Clearly, this photo is a fabrication.

This is even more glaring. She has absolutely been put into this frame to make it appear that she was a normal person with fully functioning legs. Blur tool created a toning down of the wood paneling. Facial features are soft; contrived smile; it appears that the curls were brought in. Same style as Carlee Soto of two women pressing their breasts against each other, especially the one brought in artificially to the frame. Her right breast, regardless, is cut off. Too, they are looking in different directions.

Yet, there is even greater evidence of this fraud, indisputible:

erikabrannock-shop
Look at the size of that hand: grotesque.

erikabrannockhand

Fraud alert: thumbs don’t arise from the forearm or wrist: this is absolute evidence of Photoshop manipulation

Here is another view, fully expanded, showing but the anomalous thumb and the coloration difference, where the fingers were put in:

brannockfakethumbr

No doubt about it this mother and daughter relationship is a fake based upon the anatomically impossible defects, especially this thumb installed on the forearm/wrist. The cut-line around its base is surely evidence that this is an artificial hand.

This is clearly a claw hand, reminescent of the Sandy Hook hoaxers. Note how the fingers have essentially been corrupted or painted in and are an entirelydifferent color than the dorsum of the hand. Too, there is that freakish-appearing thumb arising, incredibly, from not even the wrist but, actually, the beginning of the forearm. How about Downing’s bizarre claw? Will these women claim this photo? Moreover, why are these hands a mere blur, lower in resolution than the rest of the image?

This is such a poor job that the cut line of where the fake thumb was attached is still visible.

erikabrannock-photo1

Now, to her sister, Liz Harlan:

“The latest that we heard from her mom is that she was going back into surgery [Tuesday] morning. She’s got severe injuries to both of her legs and they were working on, I believe, reconstructing her right foot this morning,” said Liz Harlan, Brannock’s colleague and friend.

They also say her sister’s legs are broken and her brother-in-law suffered severe burns.

Brannock’s Facebook page is filled with messages of concern and support as her friends and colleagues in Maryland worry for her and wait for more information as she undergoes a second surgery at a Boston hospital.

http://cbsboston.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/brannockfamily.jpg

http://cbsboston.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/brannockfamily.jpg

No Photoshop defects in the above picture, no triplicate defects, blur tool residue, paint brush defects.

http://media2.abc2news.com//photo/2013/04/15/boston_1_20130415224749_320_240.JPG

So, who is Erika Brannock? Moreover, now that it is demonstrated that her loss of limb occurred prior to the event, how has she kept this hidden? The now suspect mother’s name is Downing, the sister Gross (by marriage, purportedly), and the handler, the real sister, Harlan.

 

Share

About Author

drkresearch

(26) Readers Comments

  1. I found one of her with legs but, it also appears to be manipulated. There is trim on the wall behind her that stops on the other side. Otherwise a low quality pic.

    • It is readily apparent that the woman in the middle of the runner and Brannock is a different one than the woman on the far right in the CBS Boston image. merely check out the size of the thighs in relation to the hands. The woman in the middle of the two runners has an emaciated lower body common among people who have run themselves into poor stature and physique. The woman in the CBS photo has a more matronly build, common for an aging mother.

  2. Seek immediate psychiatric intervention.

  3. I CAN NOT BELIEVE SOMEONE WOULD DO ALL THIS RESEARCH!!!!

    LOL

    • No, it’s much better to swallow everything whole without chewing. Do you live on slurps and shakes? Is it true that the tv is really a boob tube?

    • Hi ksmacker58
      You’re welcome.

  4. Although “Erica Brannock” has come forward as an amputee, the last to leave Boston after the Marathon (April 15 – June 3, 2013), one thing I have learned about amputations is that if you are an amputee for vascular problems (say diabetes – which she is heavy enough to be as a Type 2 possibly), then a single lower extremity amputation may not be enough. A large percentage of the 500 amputations per day performed in the US are for second ones – either higher up or of the other limb. Therefore, you can have a recent amputee whose operation followed the Marathon, but whose original condition pre-dated it. Either they came to Boston for an original procedure or a follow-up. It appears that one of the spokesman doctors is indeed a vascular specialist, who has to deal with surgery involving poor vascularization of the extremities (gangrene setting in). He’s either at Beth Israel or the Brigham and Women’s Hospital (where I had two of my kids and where a large percentage of Boston babies are born). This kind of melding of reality with fakery is something which disturbs anyone who might potentially be a patient at any of these hospitals. It is truly creepy.

  5. GET A LIFE… I’ve know the family for quite some time… and They are real and these were real injuries. Stop Hunting the family with stupid acclimations about who this horrible incident. Respect the victims injuries and privacy! (P.S. this is not my real name)

    • Hi “bobby”
      You are a liar. Go shill somewhere else.

      • LOL I second that motion. If you do know the family may we have your physical address?
        We would like to suppoena you when this family is brought up on FRAUD Charges.

  6. “Surely, there are people who know her and can affirm that her loss of limb occurred long ago. Will they do the right thing and come forward?” – Ok. I will come forward. I have known her for about 10 years and up until the bombing in Boston she had both legs.

    This website and the “facts” it presents are comical out how far they are off. If this is what people like you believe is evidence then.. wow. You claim photoshop of the picture after Nicole just finished a race. Laughable. Why just this one?? maybe you added the blurs you discuss. Why not the other 4-5 pictures that are easily found from that same day? Why not the countless pictures of all three of them together that again take 2 minutes top to find?

    Here is something that is very telling about your “proof” Are you really not smart enough to realize your magic thumb is her mother’s left arm around Erika’s waist?

    Your reaction will be predictable… you will call me a shill and a liar.

  7. Mike & Bobby ,

    Have a look at her sister’s ‘injuries’ in her iconic photo. The silicone putty over blood capsules is as plain as day and not even the same color lol and while there look at her swollen ankle & again the putty it absolute. The shrapnel shreaded arm sleaves and NO blood or skin damage. Lol even better go look at the animated gif showing Bill White breaking open his moulage prosthesis to let his fake blood spill.

    You really think anyone believes ur anonymous statement that she even existed lol

  8. Ok PC, I will play along. What would it take for you and the other conspiracy theorist to believe she existed and had both legs prior to the bombing? That they are in fact a family and the reported injuries are true?

    Maybe easily found pictures of Erika showing both legs. Or maybe looking up the times from the handful of races she ran along with the matching pictures of her at the race. Again way to easy for someone with your PC skills to find.

    I saw your “evidence” of a fabricated name and that Erika never existed because you used a website. I see how that is pure evidence because a website doesn’t list her. Did you check http://www.spokeo.com ? or http://www.anywho.com ? Or even something really simple like looking up her sister’s bio from when she was an athlete at Univ. of Tennessee. Way to easy to do basic, and I mean BASIC searches to see that the family is in fact a family. Your lack of basic research is astounding.

    So I turn this back to you.. Do you really think anyone believes your anonymous statements that she doesn’t exist?

    My point and why I waste my time with this…. They are family. They have gone through a lot of hardship since the bombing. A few people, like you, trying to make up lies about them is really sad.

    • Do you know her personally? Did she sign a non-disclosure? What is your relationship with her?

  9. As I have mentioned in both above posts, I know them and they are family. The injuries have been well reported and are a result of the bombing. However you have people like this site that rely on flawed research and supposed “evidence” to make false claims.

    When their “proof” is easily pointed out as flawed (i.e. a mother’s arm around Erika’s waist becomes a magic extra thumb… really?? Not being able to do a family connection because of a website, yet others show it. etc…) There answer is to attack and call me or others a shill.

    • Do you have any evidence–yourself, not the reports–that Mr. Gross, Mrs. Gross, and Ms. Brannock were actually physically injured? In case you just couldn’t see it, the Photoshopped hand is now enlarged:

      http://nodisinfo.commore-proof-that-erika-brannock-nicole-gross-fake/

      You didn’t answer the question, though, about their signing nondisclosures.

  10. Yes, I have seen first hand Erika’s injuries. And yes, I saw her within a month prior too the Boston bombing. As for Nicole and Michael, I have not directly seen them because a documented they flew from Boston to their home in NC.

    Again, I have looked at the picture you keep claiming is photoshopped. I keep looking… it is her mother’s hand around her waist. What are you trying to prove? Look up the other easily found photos of the family together. Very simple social media site searches and you will find them.

    What are you trying to prove???? That they are not family? Easily proven that they are family.
    That they did not receive injuries from the bombing??? Not sure what to tell you. I am a family member. I actually KNOW they have injuries now that were not there prior to the bomb going off. I actually have spent time with Erika prior to Boston and since.

    What do making these false, and easily proven false claims do for you? The family has gone through enough. As stated before… they are family that is why I care about wild accusations like this.

    And regarding your question, they did not sign any nondisclosure agreements. What is with the witch hunt against them?

  11. Also I took anoter look at the pictures on this site and another one site that keeps claiming is a photoshopped thumb. Not the one here… but the original one posted on a social media site. It is clearly, as I have stated before her mother’s hand.

    Now on to the picture of the 3 of them after Nicole ran a race… Again, you guys need to get the actual pictures not scaled down ones. So as I stated above: You claim photoshop of the picture after Nicole just finished a race. Laughable. Why just this one?? maybe you added the blurs you discuss. Why not the other 4-5 pictures that are easily found from that same day?

  12. Your silence is deafening. It is okay to admit your wrong on this issue.

  13. i know these people personally. you are disgusting to try to discredit the truth of what happened to them and to make light of the horrible injuries they sustained. getting to the bottom of a conspiracy is one thing, but making light of something horrible like this is disgusting, pathetic, a ridiculous waste of time and effort. and by the way, the picture of erikka and her mother – the one in which you say the mother looks stiff and photoshopped in…you identify the other person in that picture as just “a runner” – that other person is NICOLE GROSS. you know…the other person injured who you gone to such great lengths to say is faking her injuries. it does not make sense to me how you could be so “knowledgeable” and “skilled” at identifying fake things in photos, but can’t even tell that the “runner” in that picture is one of the people you are claiming is faking being injured by the bomb. get a life and use your “skills” for something productive that might actually do someone somewhere in the world some good. otherwise, you are a waste of space and bandwidth and bandwidth.

    • @Wowza Are you really so deficient you miss the hilarity of an internet shill disinfo agent telling anyone they should do something constructive? You win the prize. You should keep making sock puppets and posting here so we can track you down and tell your wife about http://www.FINDHISPORN.com LOL

  14. Just because you have the first Amendment right to spew verbal vomit from your brains does not mean you are right and it does not mean you have done so lawfully. I hope you people are sued. Read up on slander and liable. What a sad excuse for a human you are.

  15. are you freakin serious?? I know she is a real person and that infact she did lose a leg in the bombing because I was in the same rehabilitation center that she was in during her recovery, She had one leg that was amputated and had burns on it from the bombing. Her mother was there everyday with her. Just a sick thing to even say

    • So, exactly what rehabilitation center were you in and when? You do know that Michael Gross was in charge of the fake pyrotechnic bomb? Are you unaware or attempting to cover-up this crime?

  16. This bombing is a hoax. Look up Pee Kay Boston on You Tube. Pure hoax. This Nicole is a faker. Nicole sits there for an eternity, no injuries, no blood, no pain on her face. A pure faker.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *