UPDATED: Paul Walker’s Hoax Autopsy
UPDATED with new pictures and commentary.
Clearly, the deaths of both Paul Walker and Roger Rodas were faked. This is confirmed by the ludicrous autopsy report which was posted by the LA County Coroner’s office. According to the hoax-promoting Website TMZ:
Paul Walker‘s entire body was charred through the skin it was burned so badly … this according to the autopsy … burned so bad none of his organs were suitable for donation.
According to the report … obtained by TMZ … Walker’s body was laying supine in the passenger seat in a “pugilistic stance” — that’s a defensive position, as if he were bracing himself for impact.
Editor’s note: Stance means standing, not lying on the back-side, as is seen with the dapper cadaver dummy in the photos.
He had multiple fractures throughout his body, including his jaw, collarbone, and left upper arm. There were also various ribs and pelvic fractures.
The report concludes Walker died from “combined effects of traumatic and thermal injuries” sustained from the Nov. 30 crash in Santa Clarita, CA.
According to the report, the L.A. County Coroner is preserving portions of Paul’s organs in a jar — sources tell us tissues are kept for a certain period of time in case of lawsuits.
Roger Rodas — the driver — suffered major head trauma with the top portion of his skull fractured and his brain exposed.
(making this a major accident scene, requiring a proper examination, pictures taken by officials, and a sound coroner’s report; yet, the coroner merely kicks evidence out-of-the-way and starts laughing as the scene comes to an end)
No alcohol or drug traces were found in either body.
The report also says there was “scant soot in Walker’s trachea” — suggesting he took a few breaths after impact. Sources close to the investigation, however, tell TMZ, they believe both men died almost immediately.
Editor’s note: so they did an autopsy? Moreover, they write about “Scant soot?” Who believes it?
They both died instantly? Anonymous sources are the source of the report? Shouldn’t that be the domain of the actual professionally trained individuals, especially in such a high-profile case, the coroner versus those same, standard hoax-confirming anonymous sources?
And the report goes on … Paul had 14% carbon monoxide saturation in his blood stream (by the way, the reports only that it was “probably him”) … the normal level is 2%. Roger had 10%.
According to the report … after impact the car spun 180 degrees, struck a tree and nearly tore in half before exploding in flames.
End of TMZ’s claims.
Of course, all that this supposed network reports is terminal lies. It is simply all a story-line, mere make-believe. Is TMZ a division of NBC Universal? Actually, it is not quite that close, yet it is close enough:
TMZ is a celebrity news website that debuted on November 8, 2005. It was a collaboration between AOLand Telepictures Productions, a division of Warner Bros., until Time Warner divested AOL in 2009. The name TMZ stands for thirty-mile zone, the historic “studio zone” within a 30-mile (50 km) radius centered at the intersection of West Beverly Boulevard and North La Cienega Boulevard in Los Angeles, California.
The Wikipedia write-up continues with the owner claiming that everything on the site is thoroughly researched for accuracy. Yet, here, it has been proven that virtually all that is claimed on TMZ regarding the Walker issue is a fabrication.
Autopsy report analyzed
If the car would have struck a tree or lamp post at that level of speed and force, there would be evidence of an impact. There is no such evidence.
Regarding this coroner’s report, first, note the claim that the car struck the curb at an exceedingly high-speed. There is no evidence that any car struck that curb, no tire or car marks: nothing. At a high-speed, presumably, the car struck a tree. There is no evidence that of any expected damage to the bark of the said tree: not so much as a chip or a scratch.
Note how it begins: “According to the reported information…” Really, is that how the average coroner’s report is produced, according to ‘reported’ information presumably from the Zionist-controlled media, Universal Studios, TMZ, and, perhaps, Fast and Furious agents themselves? According to what information reports, those on Twitter and Facebook?
“I assigned both cases to me.” Really? Is this standard language in such a report? Regardless, “assigned by me” is not only highly unprofessional but also exceedingly poor English. “911 was called.” By who?
“The decendent died.” OK, that has been the standard claim. Yet, shouldn’t the world know about this if it is a lie, since money is involved as is a charitable organization soliciting donations?
Witness are mentioned? What witnesses? What are their names?
The vehicle “spun around.” Then, why are there no marks on the pavement to reflect this? It struck a tree “and then a light post.” Then, why is there no red paint marks on the light post, no scrape marks, and no damage to the bark of the tree?
The vehicle “burst into flames.” There is no evidence anywhere in the photographic record of any such bursting. Rather, there is evidence of the Fast and Furious crew starting the fire with pyrotechnic materials and flame throwers.
Really, a cement light pole was “sheared off?” How does a carbon fiber-framed Porsche achieve that? Remember, the terminology is “sheared off.” That means there would be shear stress not merely on the pole but also on the car, demonstrating this ‘shearing’ impact. According to eyewitnesses (non Fast and Furious ones) and the available photography there is no evidence of such a shearing impact.
Then, too, there is the claim that there was a broken tree. Close-up examination must be done. It will probably show that the tree was cut down with a chain saw.
Now, the final part of this statement is most curious, which is that according to this ‘official’, signed report a few feet away from the “sheared light pole” was none other than the red Porsche “with California license plate #7CCY590.” Is that not, then, confirmed officially by the coroner’s office? Then, what is this:
Did the coroner, who is not sure who died or what they look like and who waxes back-and-forth between every conceivable propped up claim: did he or she himself put it there, or was it placed there, as nodisinfo.com posters have seemingly proven via PhotoShop?
This is the best part of all, when it is said, essentially, “I didn’t do it.” In other words, “Listen, if this all blows up, and even blows up in my face, I’ve got my ground covered: I didn’t have anything to do with it. I’m just reporting what I was told.”
So, he had some clothes on, underwear and a part of a black t-shirt? Why are there no clothes lingering on the dapper cadaver dummy as it is resting upon the char? See any residual clothes, here anywhere? The hoaxers can’t even keep their hoax straight.
Caption: “Charred in a pugilistic stance.” Anybody see any charing or any pugilism?
Now, regarding the ID’ing of Paul Walker the coroner got the age right. Yet, it can’t be configured even what his eye color is or if he had a mustache or beard or even stubble? Really? Was he roasted into a char into oblivion? The dummies surely aren’t roasted to any degree, although the moulage mole aka coroner’s assistant did apply a bit of charcoal for a fake burn effect.
OK, he’s got all his teeth. However, are they really ALL-natural? Surely, he has at least some crowns, caps, bridges, or other. However, according to the report there are no tattoos? Really? Is the coroner blind?
Yet another proof of this hoax is found in the conclusions, which is that the dead man, who the coroner’s assistant did not examine (that is “did not collect any evidence”) cannot be positively identified, visually.” What was his source, the imagery scene on TV of the dapper cadavers suffering all that reflection from the strobe lights? No matter, the report continues, “it’s probably Paul Walker.” Probably? Really? Is that the best this high-powered coroner’s office can do?
The report also lists this man at 5’11”; however, numerous reports place him at nearly 6’2”.
Next of kin? Did they really view the body?
While no one can say for sure what the Walker relatives did just after the fact, regarding the night of the event there is a bit of information:
Mixed among the NBC Universal crowd the parents did show up, but they didn’t seem to be upset about their son’s “pugilistic stance.”
Paul Walker, Sr., doesn’t seem to be too upset about it all, these reports of a man, rather, his own son fighting for his life down to the last second, even after giving it a day or so to set in.
They made sure that the last line is put in there, which is that he is too burnt into a crisp to be an organ donor. The coroner’s report is a farce – an absolute hoax. Who could prove otherwise?
Now, the man laughing it up with the rest of the crew on the night of the supposed fatalities has been identified: it’s the Assistant Chief LA County Coroner Ed Winter himself:
Same jacket: what about the coroner’s news conference that night? Were there any further revelations there?
Caption: A smirk is seen on Coroner Winter’s face as he concludes his last words of the interview. Money was surely exchanged. As NBC Universal is on the receiving end of hoax-related sales, did it lay out financial favors for the participants?
Said Winter according to the LA Times the men really did die, “within seconds”, when the Times then stated that their bodies had been “positively identified through dental records.” Yet, as anyone can see such an identification was never mentioned in the autopsy report, rather, a contrary statement was made, which was that in Walker’s case all that could be said is that it was “probably” him.
Includes information on the hoax hood piece theft, which was developed in all likelihood as a distraction once the scam was realized.