Updated, error in photo analysis corrected, April 5, 2012
No One Died: The Allison Wyatt-Madeleine Hsu Fraud
This post will prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that no children died at Sandy Hook. Simply put, if the death of one child was faked, moreover, if that identity is also a fake, then, the entire claim for a massacre is a hoax.
People are fed up with this fabrication known as the Sandy Hook hoax. Yet, among all the tyrannical acts, lies, and deceit there is some good news. No one by the names Allison Wyatt and Madeleine Hsu died at Sandy Hook on Dec. 14, 2012. That reduces the potential school-yard massacre victims to 18.
Both these identities are fabricated. That is proven by the illicit media itself through its own photographic uploads.
Recall from the previous post No Sandy Hook Children Died that in pre-published write-ups on SIPA Press and REXonline.com it was stated that there were between 18 and 20 child victims of the massacre. Were the perpetrators unsure at that time, apparently six months before the event, that they could fill the other two identities?
In the case of Madeleine Hsu SIPA, as well as REX, couldn’t keep its falsifications straight. Incredibly, Madeleine was pictured by both SIPA and REX as two different people: one of obvious Oriental descent and the other of Anglo descent. See the clear and unprecedented fraud, here:
SIPA/REX Photo, #1
This fakery is glaringly clear. Both images, entirely different people are attributed to Madeleine Hsu. Credit for this attribution isn’t a specific photographer but, rather, the international entities themselves, REX and SIPA. They prove themselves frauds with their own postings.
It says victim Madeleine F. Hsu in both pictures. Also, there is this commentary in both images of her being “one of the last of two child victims to be identified…” Yet, how were they identified, incredibly, “by photograph?” Who saw the photographs, the coroner? How about Governor Malloy? Did he get a chance to see those two photos? No one else did. Moreover, there is surely no reason to take SIPA’s/REX’s word for it.
Now, a message to SIPA, REX, Coroner Carver, President Obama, and Governor Malloy: Why not produce those two photos of the deceased to dispel all doubt? How about it, Governor Malloy? Up to the challenge? They were identified after all by photograph in a different way, that is fake photos uploaded by SIPA/REX for media consumption. Was the reason for being “not sure about the other two” because of not being certain you could get away with it? Did the Mossad not have a certain case for the other two fake identities, perhaps until the last moment.
The evidence for their concern regarding the last two identities is significant. In this regard the spies blundered severely. They called this person Madeleine Hsu:
Importantly, note their commentary, that this photo, though it is not Madeleine Hsu or even remotely similar to her, “has been posted on Facebook on a page set up in her memory.” Set up by whom, presumably the Mossad and CIA? Note also all the critical key words in place from the outset.
They also called her, notably in the DailyMail and dozens of other outlets, Allison Wyatt:
Here is another example, where major publications, like the UK’s DailyMail, give an alternative identity to the girl in the pony tails:
To reiterate, this was the uploading source of those photos, SIPA-WEX, timestamp as noted:
She is neither of these persons. Nor has any harm come to her. This girl is fully alive and well and is yet another victim of Zionist machinations. Her name is Lilly Gaubert and the fraud against her was discovered by her mother, Cathy Gaubert:
According to Mrs. Gaubert her daughter’s picture was robbed from her flickr page without her consent. That image was then associated with the child’s death as well as attempts at fundraising. Mrs. Gaubert made an appeal to have all such mis-use of her daughter’s pictures, those uses associated apparently with her being a victim and/or fundraising, purged from the Internet:
This led to investigations of fraud and deceit regarding the Sandy Hook perpetrators with YouTube videos of great popularity by Scott Walker and Royan Rosche:
Mrs. Gaubert has a huge case against SIPA/REX and their handlers for stealing her picture from the Internet, causing her and her family great distress. Originally, it was speculated that it was a random act and that it just kept popping up on Facebook sites, being shared, randomly. This post proves that this is not the case and that, rather, it was a malicious, premeditated act, that is to use a kind of likeness that agents of SIPA/REX found on the Internet and then insidiously stole. REX/SIPA is taking full credit not only for the procurement or taking of this photo but also for the rights to sale. How many thousands of dollars, therefore, did SIPA/REX make on this wicked fraud? SIPA was virtually bankrupt at the time. Were promises made for the role in this criminal activity?One more time for the absolute and legally binding proof:
Those are precisely the SIPA and REX logos, taking full credit for this larcenous fraud, the SIPA one in red. For further confirmation of their criminal acts
here is the extract from the enlargement off the side panel of the picture, adding additional proof of fraud against these corrupt ones:
The real Allison Wyatt?
In fact, there is no real Allison Wyatt, that is her entire identity is a fraud. Even so, months ago her face was selected for this false flag act, demonstrating that REX and SIPA are clearly perpetrators:
Just when did they decide she was a FINAL VICTIM, on June 15 or December 14? All evidence points to the fact that it was well before the purported event. Here is a marked-up version of the same:
the birthday cake could possibly have been cropped in and is fake, just as is her image and the chair. Another possibility is that the The cake is real (better analysis), and this is a real birthday celebration; there appears to be a part of a person’s hair to the right screen.
Thus, when the scam was in its early stages there were originally two Allison Wyatts listed in the media systems. This would indicate that these vile ones had difficulty putting these final two identities together. These are not the blog’s words or pictures but, rather, are derived from the perpetrator’s sources themselves.
Yet, is the photo real? She does bear somewhat of a resemblance to Lilly Gaubert. Is there some type of corruption involved, here? There is one obvious defect, which defies explanation. What is this cord of color/hair: it is completely straight with hard edges? Real or artifact: let the experts decide.
There is no hair which behaves like that. Thus, some degree of manipulation was involved.
Another view of the psyops birthday party, pink cake with 6 candles to commemorate being a six-year old. As pointed out by a poster there is a hand in the far left frame; this is a real cake with real candles as can be seen by the smoke from the candles from blowing them out:
Therefore, there is no one in existence named Allison Wyatt who was an actual victim of a Sandy Hook shooting, and, surely, no such individual exists by that name who was murdered on that day. Early uploads of the photos demonstrate great confusion by the media sources, using a picture of an entirely different person to represent her.
Thus, everything associated with this name is a grand fraud, especially any fund raising efforts. Every dime collected is done through vile extorsion and is representive of a criminal enterprise:
Did anyone see the mind control commentary about the goldfish crackers? Then, this, too is found on the site:
Someone needs to contact the Allison Benefit groups and inform them of the extorsion. They must refund all donors, because this is the least that must be done to honor the children (even the fake children, whose pictures and identities have been used in vain):
Here is yet another isolated picture of the girl, if it is the same person. No picture exists of Ms. Wyatt with an adult. Note also the use of the same hair pin in each of the photos. This is surely a fabricated picture.
Here is Cathy Gaubert’s lovely family. At a minimum she is due a retraction and apology AND all funds collected while malicously using her daughter’s photo.
Post to be updated as soon as possible.