The Fake Injuries of Norway Shooting Hoaxer Ina Rangones Libak
It is absolutely the case that regarding the Norway massacre hoax associate, Ina Rangones Libak, her injuries are fake. Proving her injuries as fabricated has vast implications. It means that all the injuries, as well as deaths, acclaimed in relation to an actual Breivik shooting and bombing rampage are phonies.
It all purportedly occurred on Utoya Island in full isolation from the public eye, with not the slightest element of law enforcement anywhere to be found. According to the story line Rangones Libak was nearly killed on the Island:
Bank, pictured above
Karoline Bank’s arm cramped as she pressed a shredded T-shirt onto Ina Libak’s wounds. Banks, the 20-year-old student, was covered in her friend’s blood and camouflaged with sticks and dirt trying to hide her bright purple hoodie.
Libak whimpered softly as blood seeped from wounds above her clavicle, and from her palms and the creases of her elbows. When the shooter had pointed his gun at her head, Libak instinctively raised her hands to shield her eyes.
And that is supposedly how she got blood on her palms. Yet, let everyone in the world be assured. The story lines are false.
This is what Ms. Libak said at the staged Andres Behring Breivik trial:
The New York Times reports that Libak’s testimony, “had spectators laughing and crying by turns.”
Now, let us look, rationally, at her statements. She was shot first in the arms, then in the jaw, and finally in the chest. Despite this, she “ran out of the building.” This was in order to “begin her escape.” Is she super-woman? How could she even get up off the ground after being shot three times by a high-powered weapon?
She did her best to stop herself from bleeding to death but found out that she couldn’t exert pressure, because “the hands weren’t working all that well anyway.” Who believes such drivel?
Here are some images of INA LIBAK in the hospital, snapped 11 days or slightly longer after the acclaimed shooting:
Does anyone see even the slightest evidence of gunshot trauma to this individual? How about just a tiny bit of disfiguring of the face?
She was actually shot just a few days prior to the taking of this picture in the jaw? Really?
Warning: Graphic image. How about a bit of post-traumatic swelling? That’s what gunshot wounds usually do. What about an actual entrance wound and/or exit wound? What about at least a bit of dire distress?
Where is the evidence of a shot from a long rifle to her jaw? What about the wound to the chest? Where is the evidence for this? Why is there no staining of the bandage with serous fluid and/or blood? How could she be sitting up so casually after being shot in the upper or mid-chest, a major, life-threatening trauma:
When this happens, no one is laughing or smiling.
Here she is, all smiles, in a hospital bed, and how is she dressed? She is in street clothes.
First she’s on the bed to the left of the middle table, then she is switched over to the other bed. She was never in the hospital. It was all staged. Too, where is the sucking wound in her chest? Where is the residual blood and secretions? Where is the drainage tube for her chest injury? Moreover, what is she doing unattended, standing up on her own: and in full street clothes, yet?
Didn’t they have their cell phones with them? How come they couldn’t capture a picture of the carnage, of themselves, and/or of Breivik in action?
Ina Rangønes Libak meets Crown Princess Mette-Marit and Crown Prince Haakon in March this year (File photo: Anette Karlsen/Scanpix)
The Royal Family is not stupid. They fully know this is a fake. Yet, to support Zionist machinations they gave their endorsement in full.
Prince Haakon, Princess Mette-Marit, and their associates have fully supported this fake. They are Zionist agents, all together.