Hard Evidence of Grief Staging in AirAsia Crash Hoax
UPDATED with two new images
With revelations thanks to nodisinfo.com posters
OK, everyone, you were right. The AirAsia crash is a hoax, just like the others. Must have been in a New Year’s Eve dream world, missing this one: big-time. As a result, the previous posts will be purged for lack of solid conclusion until regenerated: for the sake of accuracy.
Even so, the image doesn’t lie. If people are faking it, this will ultimately be revealed. In the video the fabrication of grief can be clearly seen. If a person is really suffering a loss, has truly lost a loved one, there is no need to fake it. There is no need to act differently, that is taking cues from the camera-person. Nevertheless, there was imagery posted prior where people were shedding tears, and that led to erroneous conclusions despite the various red-flags raised by posters. Now, it is known for certain that in regard to this purported crash there is staging of grief, and this alone offers strong evidence for the fake.
Yet, this is precisely what this man achieved. Just as he realizes the camera-person has placed his focus on him, he performs an act. It is the hand-to-the-forehead fake grief ‘reaction:’
NOTE: He is acting. Why does he need to perform such an act? It is only because he is a paid actor, a crisis actor mole caught in the act. Too, what is behind him? It looks like a media staging tent or other facility. Clearly, he is faking grief; there can be no other conclusion.
This woman does a ‘hand-over-the-mouth’ grief act, then quickly pulling the hand away, also while under the scrutiny of the camera lens. It is done while looking at the passenger list for maximum subliminal effect
One of the clearest examples of such staged grief relates to the woman in the red headdress. It appears that she is absolutely being paraded before the cameras. No one seems to care about their privacy or peace of mind. In this case the woman plus another person seems content to go directly before the cameras for a number of video/camera shoots.
Take One, which is the man holding the long video-cam above, then swinging it to her, front and center:
Then, Take Two, which is the man with the telephoto lens, who also swings around, front and center, as the woman and her handler/husband/or whatever, parades her before the camera. There can be no sound basis for such behavior in the event of a real catastrophe. Who in their right minds would want to go through that?
At this moment he begins snapping the pictures.
This woman is holding the tissues plus cell phone, also as a staged camera shot. There is no crying going on, so there is no need for the tissue paper.
She is moving back and forth and making a number of gesticulations, as if she is in horrific grief. She is acting as if she is sobbing. Yet, she is not sobbing at all.
These people should be in a constant state of shock and despair. Why are they so calm?
The CEO of AirAsia is a Rothschild cohort:
Tony Fernandes emerges as clear favourite to take over West Ham
Tony Fernandes has emerged as the clear favourite to take control of West Ham United. The Malaysian entrepreneur is hoping to fly to London on Wednesday to conclude a deal and would be a popular owner of the Premier League club.
Fernandes’ ties to Rothschild offer a key proof of the nature of this issue. With this tie, then, this crash must be regarded as a hoax unless proven otherwise. The House of Rothschild and its agents can be directly tied to the other two Malaysian-related airline phonies. In fact, regarding Malaysian Airlines the Rothschild Zionists are the major stake-holder. Did they, then, as a means of absolute control also create AirAsia? Are they the financiers behind Fernandes’ rise to great fortune?
What is the purpose of this? Why would Fernandes do this, that is unless he is nothing other than a submissive agent of the arch-Zionist Rothschild cabal? Who in their right mind would fake an airline crash, knowing the potential damaging effect it would have on business? Yet, then, how can mere corruption, mere raw deviousness, ever be readily explained?