The Louvre Museum Machete Attack Hoax in Pictures
What an arch-hoax it is, this so-called Louvre museum machete attack. It’s another Islamophobic scam, make no mistake about it. The French fraud artists are in high-gear with this one, expecting the world to believe that a man with not one machetes but two actually charged armed French troops.
Regardless, who finds it plausible that the man would do this, one machete in each hand? What in the world would he hope to achieve, especially attacking well-armed gunmen, who could shoot him dead on the spot. Nevertheless, somehow, people believe it really happened.
The poor French armed agents, poor fellows, one of them was “slightly wounded” by a machete. Sure, he was, right: that is right in the middle of the Louvre. What happened to the metal detectors anyway?
No wonder the policeman is smirking at the entire thought of this as he enters the arch-staged scene, that is this farce and absolute fraud.
The world is to believe that this man did this, mad as he was, in isolation, just as some form of payback. What beef does an Egyptian man have with the French secret services? Moreover, why are these police looking directly up the steps instead of at the machete man? Do they fear another knife-wielding madman is on the loose?
Counter-terrorism experts describe the scene, for instance, on the George Galloway Radio Show, that the man entered the region against four heavily armed gunman, French anti-terror police, who tried to talk him down. What in the world were they doing there in the first instance?
Below is the typical headline seen throughout the Internet. Where is the CCTV film confirming it?
What is this paramilitary man doing looking at the camera? Why isn’t he paying attention to the knifeman?
Oh, I see, right, he is looking for the cue, as the French espionage agent acts like he is putting out his finger, that is ‘There is no God but Allah,’ etc.
By the way how Egyptian does this man appear, regardless? It seems that his skin is a bit too light for that.
The accused just happens to be related to a powerful military person. Thus, it is said: “Retired Egyptian police general Reda al-Hamamy accused the soldier who shot him of “using brute force with a poor young man.” Even so, who finds it plausible that the precise son of a Western-trained Egyptian general would actually be the terrorist attacker?
Here is also what the father said:
“This incident doesn’t make any sense… They said he hurt a soldier and then another soldier fired at him… Why haven’t we seen this soldier’s injury?
“This is a cover up so they don’t have to apologise or justify the acts of this soldier who used brutal force with a poor, 29-year-old young man.”
Here is the supposedly wounded soldier. He is just casually being wheeled out, as if nothing happened. That is right, because nothing did happen.
This is a total hoax. There is no possibility it is real. It’s merely staged as an Islamophobic fake. Now, the people are coming forward saying, “But of course we like this, all this security. It makes us feel really safe, more safe than before.”
This is an image purportedly ‘right after the attack.’ What’s so funny about it? Yet, all is well. Another ‘crazy’ has been put down. The all-knowing, all-powerful French system has again prevailed, the good guy winning over the bad. We’re all safe know. Thanks, officers, for keeping us safe.