What a Real Airplane Crash Site Looks Like Vs. MH17 Hoax
In a real plane crash a real plane falls from the sky, like this Mexicana jet airliner:
With all the cell phones and other cameras that were aimed at the sky, at least something similar to this should have been seen. Keep in mind that there are at least three videos on line of people aiming at the area of the explosion several seconds prior to the fireball. Why wasn’t the plane seen? Once again, in the MH17 hoax no one showed this. Instead, this is what is seen:
There is a helicopter heard hovering in the background with photographers/videographers in place. They were there in advance of the supposed crash. Yet, what did they capture with their film? They captured no crash nor any descending airplane or its debris – or its trail of smoke. Instead, they photographed the imagery of an explosion, one which arises from the ground-up:
A screen capture from a video showing the initial detonation. The detonation arises from the ground upwards. There is no element which has as its source a crash from the sky.
Puff, it’s like magic. There is a full sky above, and there is no imagery to match what is seen on the ground? This is hard proof of the scam, proving that the crash was faked. Those plane parts were on the ground, and they were blown up through detonation. In all likelihood pyrotechnic accelerants were used instead of acrid petrol-based ones.
The fuel tanks in the wings were likely fully drained. It was all done, Hollywood-style, with directors and producers on-hand. To do so a strategic area was needed, one that was highly remote where there would be no surprises. Since it was fake, the metal – the wreckage – needed to be brought to the area, essentially as scrap metal. This would necessity a proper roadway. To access the fields where the fake crash would be staged the roads would be essential.
What is the buffoon doing squating towards the ground – it is all fake, all a movie-style set. Note the clear and categorical proximity to the road, where virtually all the major strewn wreckage can be found, a physical impossibility:
Note also the fact that the strewn wreckage is situated on each side of the road, another evidence of the fake. Too, it appears that they had the foam trucks ready to go. How did the foam trucks get there so quickly? Obviously, they were there in advance. The so-called pro-Russian rebels were mere actors, just like the people who were presumably inspecting the wreckage.
Nothing about this is real, and that includes the purported deceased. These are largely crisis dummies, silicone fakes, but also inflatable ones:
Clearly, these are not real humans, dead or otherwise. In particular, note the balloon-like nature of that hand. Note also the fact that it is tied up, attached to some element to keep it up in the air (more drama, here).~ Now, for real plane crashes. These crashes are virtually never by roads. The odds for that are exceedingly slim:
The ground is pummelled into oblivion, grass is uprooted, shrubs and trees are torn down. There are kerosene-based fires, which may prove difficult to extinguish. There is dark grey and even black smoke; the fire is fiery orange in color.
It’s chaos; little can be done about it other than to put out the fires. Once the fires are out, they do not reignite. There is much char, and human beings may well be roasted to a crisp. It’s horror scene, make no mistake about it.
Consider in comparison the crash in Greece of Helios 522. This crash clearly demonstrates that the MH17 event (it’s not a crash) is a hoax:
Those elements which are highly flammable do often catch on fire, including foam and cardboard as well as luggage and seats. The same is true with the grass, shrubs, and trees, as seen above. What about MH17? This was a most notable exception. Nothing spontaneously caught on fire, not even the cardboard boxes:
Does anyone see any roasted grass or shrubs – even a little bit? How about the wreckage? Is there any char there? Is there any soot on the exterior? How about even a small degree of traumatic crumpling that gives the appearance of the powers of forces during a real crash?
How about stains from earthen material and/or grass? Is anything at all seen? … Versus this airliner which crashed in a mountainous area of Greece:
Note the asymetric traumatic crumpling of the engine and its casing.
In this diabolical hoax there is no such assymetric crumpling of the engine casing. Other than the pyrotechnic-based burn damage, the engine is normal, fully intact.
The aluminum casing has merely been roasted off. There is no other damage to it. The ring, which would have been subjected to great forces, was not damaged in the least. Note the close proximity of the t-section in the road. This is all proof of staging, that is a hoax.
There is absolutely no possibility that this was a real crash. Through their Zionist assets from the United States, as well as local Zionist treacherous ones, such as Ihor Kolomoisky and his gang, this was staged:
The total lack of impact damage to the engine means that it was merely an element of strewn wreckage. The source could well have been a defunct Malaysian Airlines vessel, most likely the one purchased by the Zionists and stored earlier this year in Tel Aviv. In a real crash of a jumbo jet the vectors of force are vast. A 777 weights over 600,000 pounds. The earth would be damaged, scarred, and scorched. People would be crushed to death; bones would be broken. The clothes would be torn up but not completely stripped off. It would never represent merely a pile of garbage next to a road:
In fact, the contrast between the two, the fake and the real, is vast:
In the Greek crash there are bodies strewn throughout the crash site, people who were largely killed by blunt trauma, God rest their souls. Note also the degree of dirt impaction in the seats, a phenomenon never seen in the MH17 hoax.
They forgot to inflate the dummy’s legs. Didn’t anybody notice?
It’s all merely clean scrap metal, that is strewn wreckage, which is burnt by pyrotechnics. The fake bodies were planted after the fact.
Are these people from outer space? This is an inflatable dummy with moulage added. There can be no other possibility. He or rather it is grabbing the grass, a pointed out by YouTubers. How is that possible?
The contrast is striking. Note the extensive destruction of the plane, the filth, the dirt, the crushed bodies, the bodies dead from blunt trauma. No pristine corpses, here.
This is a set-up perpetrated by the global Zionist cabal. Its purpose is to distract the world from the high crimes committed by hedonistic Zionist Jews against the Palestinian people.
Look at the face of this entity; surely, it is a dapper cadaver, in other words by no means is it real.
WARNING: Graphic image below… Direly, this is what happens when bodies get caught in the fire of exploding jet fuel, that is hydrazine or kerosene:
If there is grass, shrubs, or trees in the path of the destructive crash, it is consumed:
This crash in Libya seems to show the random nature of the wreckage. No neat piles are seen here. Yet, as one person has brought out there is no char, nothing that was set on fire. The man in the white suit is worthy of investigation. Plus, the ID numbers are right in the film for additional suspicious convenience.
This is much more obvious, that is as the aftermath of a real crash involving an Algerian jumbo jet:
Here is a good example of the imprint created by the forces of a jumbo jet crash.
There is no such imprint anywhere to be seen in the hoax MH17 crash.
It’s just a pyrotechnic fake, a Hollywood-style movie set. Surely, no toxic jet fuel was used, which would have posed serious issues.