Shooting of Pope John Paul was a Fake
According to the New York Daily News, among others, in 1981 the much-revered Pope John Paul was shot in an attempted assassination. It all supposedly occurred on Satan’s day, May 13. This was a key anniversary, that of the Lady of Fatima hoax. Who in the world finds this plausible?
It’s the pope, after all. That was big news. Four shots were fired, so it is stated, and three people, including the pope, were struck.
“Shots were fired,” so it was said, precisely at the moment of the screenshots seen below:
It was just as his jeep was exiting the public arena. the shooter is supposedly in the immediate vicinity.
Once again, clearly, the sound of “shots fired” occurs just as the vehicle exits the arena. Suddenly, then, it speeds off. At this moment there is a man, front screen, who acts in a suspect way.
He is a signaling mole. Let us watch him.
There should be a degree of the unknown, here, if this were a real shooting. There shouldn’t be a signaling mole ready to go, reacting, on the moment, all on the other side of the barrier.
Here he is again, giving more signals. Regardless, why aren’t all these Vatican agents running to the Pope’s defense, protecting him, guarding him? Moreover, where is the purported assassin in this frame? He is nowhere to be seen.
‘Come on, come on, were ready. Let’s get this hoax rolling.”
These men are operating the elements of a scam. They are doing nothing to protect the Pope from the line of fire.
IMAGE removed as not relevant (from movie, not actual ‘event’).
He was shot in the right shoulder/arm, the left index finger, and the abdomen. This is inconceivable. There would be much blood with the white robe clearly being splattered and stained. There is no blood visible, and the left index finger is unharmed, normal.
Yet, in this image what is seen?
Suddenly, in this poor resolution photo an ‘injury’ is seen. Yet, there is no evidence of any blood, real blood. Nor is there even the slightest evidence of an actual gunshot wound, an entrance injury with tearing of the clothes and the profuse spurting or spraying of blood. Nor is the Pope bent over, which would be the natural reaction for an abdominal gunshot victim. He is instead upright; it makes not sense. The dots of color are not blood. They appear to have been dabbed on with the PhotoShop tool; the finger is also a PhotoShop corruption.
Where is all the blood? Why isn’t he bent over in pain? Why is there no blood on the dorsum of his hand?
The NYT says he was struck twice. According to the New York Daily News: John Paul spent nearly three weeks recovering from injuries to his abdomen and from a massive loss of blood.
That would be true if a person really was shot through the shoulder and abdomen at relatively close range.
So, there it is, the gun and the purported shooter. Here is another view.
So, the Pope was standing up when he was ‘shot,’ and there is no evidence of a reaction to a gun-blast, no falling over or sideways, no evidence of such impact anywhere to be seen? Too, regarding Agca it appears that his image is a fake, that he was installed into the still photo. Note the fingers; they appear to be artificially added.
The bullet purportedly went all the way through him, then striking another person, Rose Hall. Therefore, of necessity there must be an exit wound somewhere on his backside.
Hall is not camera-shy. Usually, despite being struck by a bullet she is smiling. Here she holds up her arm for the cameras.
Wounded when Pope John Paul II was attacked Wednesday, Rose Hall, 20, from the USA, now living in Wurzburg, West Germany smiles, on Friday from her bed as she awaits treatment at Santo Spirito Hospital, Friday, May 15, 1981, Rome, Italy. (AP Photo/Raoul Fornezza)
As is typical in such hoaxes it was ‘all in the family, with crisis actors in coordination with the key actor. In the image on the right the Pope takes of his precious time to meet with crisis actor Hall and her family. Both the fake injured are Americans. Who would find this a coincidence?
Her hospitalization is a fake, just like all the other hoaxing agents of the international Zionist cabal.
The woman pictured below is listed as a 58 year-old “American woman, Ann Odre.” She also feigned an injury, in her case, once again, by a bullet that per the arch-Zionist had already struck the Pope:
Ann Odre, the Buffalo woman wounded by a bullet that pierced Pope John Paul II
Note the fake injured Papal finger, right in the midst of the photo shoot. Too, does Odre appear to have suffered the consequences of a gunshot wound?
Ali Agca is also a fake, a mere crisis actor playing the role. He shot no one and surely made no threats against the Pope.
Therefore, the shooting of the Pope was a hoax. Agca was described alternatively as a Communist Palestinian sympathizer and also a man “tied to Muslim radicals.” This alone is proof that the entire claim of the shooting of the Pope by a person of Muslim background is nothing other than a treacherous arch-Zionist hoax.
Addendum: Note that the purported attempted assassination of Ronald Reagan also occurred in 1981. This, too, is a fake. More on this later.