Other Hoaxes Zionist Terror — 03 April 2017
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Smoke Bombs Used to Fake Terror Attack in St. Petersburg Subway Bombing Hoax

Make no mistake about it the purported terror attack in St. Petersburg where, supposedly, a shrapnel-filled bomb was let loose is a fake and a hoax. There was no such bomb. Instead, smoke bombs were used to feign a terror attack in what was nothing other than an arch-drill and terminally corrupt fake.

The fact that it was clouded by not bomb-blast residue but, rather, as a consequence of the letting loose of harmless pyrotechnic devices is seen clearly, here:

This is obviously mere pyrotechnic-released smoke with imagery taken by in-placed camera-toting personnel. Regardless, the crowd represents pre-hired crisis actors paid a fee for their role in the scam. The lack of any crisis-related reactions, no urgency, no true panic or horror, is hard proof that this is a set up and and a fake.

Moreover, as far as hoaxes are concerned this is a most inane one, absolutely poorly constructed, obvious to even the most un-sophisticated eye:

No one can believe this is anything other than a drill considering how casual are the individuals seen on-site.  The people are looking directly into the cameras and are moving about in a ambling course; no one is in shock, no one shows any fear or panic; no one is clearly and obviously injured:

A person can see the nature of the drill, here, with crisis actors feigning wounds abounding. Note the application of fake blood on the cement structure, also the seated man. Notice what is in his hand. It is a packet of fake blood.

It does appear that the individual, fully unhurt, is manipulating a fake blood packet to pour on, possibly, his clothes.

Here are two fire extinguishers placed as props, simply put on the pavement in a line: a sloppy effort, as far as hoaxes go.

The doors were wrenched or pried out with no other major damage seen, certainly none of the expected bomb-blast-related destruction.

Once the smoke has cleared the exclusive damage to the door, saving the rest of the cab, is seen, here:

It appears that fake blood has been applied to the metal frame as well as dabbed inside.

No wonder people are smiling and smirking in the back-ground.

This is a hoax and a drill. Nothing real or hurtful happened, here. No one was injured. No one died. There was no ‘Islamist’ Chechen bomber.

  

Sources:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/04/03/explosion-onst-petersburg-metro-russia-pictures/chaotic-scenes-st-petersburg0/

Share

About Author

drkresearch

(34) Readers Comments

  1. The first video I saw was of people being relaxed and just waiting for their train. No way explosions took place. Also police wouldnt give any info away at this stage of investigation.

    • 10 characteristics of conspiracy theorists
      A useful guide by Donna Ferentes

      1. Arrogance. They are always fact-seekers, questioners, people who are trying to discover the truth: sceptics are always “sheep”, “shills”, patsies of a Zionist controlled government etc.

      2. Relentlessness. They will always go on and on about a conspiracy no matter how little evidence they have to go on or how much of what they have is simply discredited. (Moreover, as per 1. above, even if you listen to them ninety-eight times, the ninety-ninth time, when you say “no thanks”, you’ll be called a “sheep” again.) Additionally, they have no capacity for precis whatsoever. They go on and on at enormous length.

      3. Inability to answer questions. For people who loudly advertise their determination to the principle of questioning everything, they’re pretty poor at answering direct questions from sceptics about the claims that they make.

      4. Fondness for certain stock phrases. These include Cicero’s “cui bono?” (of which it can be said that Cicero understood the importance of having evidence to back it up), ” do your own research”, and Conan Doyle’s “once we have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however unlikely, must be the truth”. What these phrases have in common is that they are attempts to absolve themselves from any responsibility to produce positive, hard evidence themselves: you simply “eliminate the impossible” (i.e. say the official account can’t stand scrutiny) which means that the wild allegation of your choice, based on “cui bono?” (which is always the government) is therefore the truth.

      5. Inability to employ or understand Occam’s Razor. Aided by the principle in 4. above, conspiracy theorists never notice that the small inconsistencies in the accounts which they reject are dwarfed by the enormous, gaping holes in logic, likelihood and evidence in any alternative account.

      6. Inability to tell good evidence from bad. Conspiracy theorists have no place for peer-review, for scientific knowledge, for the respectability of sources. The fact that a claim has been made by anybody, anywhere, is enough for them to reproduce it and demand that the questions it raises be answered, as if intellectual enquiry were a matter of responding to every rumour. While they do this, of course, they will claim to have “open minds” and abuse the sceptics for apparently lacking same.

      7. Inability to withdraw. It’s a rare day indeed when a conspiracy theorist admits that a claim they have made has turned out to be without foundation, whether it be the overall claim itself or any of the evidence produced to support it. Moreover they have a liking (see 3. above) for the technique of avoiding discussion of their claims by “swamping” – piling on a whole lot more material rather than respond to the objections sceptics make to the previous lot.

      8. Leaping to conclusions. Conspiracy theorists are very keen indeed to declare the “official” account totally discredited without having remotely enough cause so to do. Of course this enables them to wheel on the Conan Doyle quote as in 4. above. Small inconsistencies in the account of an event, small unanswered questions, small problems in timing of differences in procedure from previous events of the same kind are all more than adequate to declare the “official” account clearly and definitively discredited. It goes without saying that it is not necessary to prove that these inconsistencies are either relevant, or that they even definitely exist.

      9. Using previous conspiracies as evidence to support their claims. This argument invokes scandals like the Birmingham Six, the Bologna station bombings, the Zinoviev letter and so on in order to try and demonstrate that their conspiracy theory should be accorded some weight (because it’s “happened before”.) They do not pause to reflect that the conspiracies they are touting are almost always far more unlikely and complicated than the real-life conspiracies with which they make comparison, or that the fact that something might potentially happen does not, in and of itself, make it anything other than extremely unlikely.

      10. It’s always a conspiracy. And it is, isn’t it? No sooner has the body been discovered, the bomb gone off, than the same people are producing the same old stuff, demanding that there are questions which need to be answered, at the same unbearable length. Because the most important thing about these people is that they are people entirely lacking in discrimination. They cannot tell a good theory from a bad one, they cannot tell good evidence from bad evidence and they cannot tell a good source from a bad one. And for that reason, they always come up with the same answer when they ask the same question.

      • Brilliant description. Apparently NOTHING bad happens in the world. It’s all fake. And, given all the crisis actors that must be involved, and all of the people that must be “in on it”, why has there ever been a whistle blower. There’s always someone who will spill the beans!!

      • points one to ten….total BS….
        one phrase: where’s the mobile ‘phone footage?

        • and….incidents like the Port Arthur “massacre”, 9/11 and Sandy Hook have been extensively and meticulously investigated by highly qualified people over a period of many years…..and….are able to meet the high standard(s) required in a court of law vis á vis a criminal charge…..so…points iii, v, vi and viii are totally wrong!
          (the remainder of the “points” are, mostly, BS ad homs any-way!)

          its the main-stream media maggots who are the total shills and liars….the arrogant, self-righteous so-and-so`s….

          • Passionate hatred can give meaning and purpose to an empty life. Thus people haunted by the purposelessness of their lives try to find a new content not only by dedicating themselves to a holy cause but also by nursing a fanatical grievance. The conspiracy nutjob movement offers them unlimited opportunities for both. Enjoy stewing in your hate: you’re nearly done. Hehe he.

        • FIFTEEN ways to detect a false flag “incident”

          ☞False Flag Formula #1: Drill at the Same or Nearby Time and Place
          The exercise or drill – at the same time, at the same place – has became the sine qua non or indispensable element of the recent false flag operation.

          ☞False Flag Formula #2: Foreknowledge
          Another way you can tell that a mass shooting is a false flag op is if you find proof of foreknowledge of the event. As it so happens, all of the notorious and publicized mass attacks of late have had evidence of foreknowledge. Going way back in time, there was foreknowledge of the Pearl Harbor attack of 1941 that got the US into World War 2. There were many aspects of foreknowledge on 9/11, including the BBC reporting WTC7 falling before it actually did, and mysterious calls to people like author Salman Rushdie and San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown advising them not to fly to NYC on Sept. 11th. Sandy Hook had blatant foreknowledge (with various webpages put up days before the event), as did the Boston Marathon.

          ☞False Flag Formula #3: Eyewitnesses Have Conflicting Accounts
          You can also spot a likely false flag operation when you see or hear of multiple conflicting witness accounts.

          ☞False Flag Formula #4: MSM Quickly Name and Demonize the Patsy
          Have you ever wondered how quickly the MSM (Mainstream Media) discovers the name of the patsy? They had somehow deduced that Osama bin Laden was responsible for 9/11 just hours after the attacks. Have you ever wondered why the Government is so good at telling us who supposedly executed these attacks right after they happen, with almost no time to investigate, yet can’t seem to manage to actually stop these alleged terror attacks?

          ☞False Flag Formula #5: Patsy Has No Military Training, Yet Shoots Extremely Fast and Accurately
          Another element of the false flag formula is the skilled and lethal patsy.

          ☞False Flag Formula #6: Patsy Gets Killed, Drugged or “Suicided”
          It is also part of the false flag formula to ensure that the patsy, who is earmarked before the event to take the fall, cannot speak out to rationally defend themselves. This is achieved in a number of ways. The simplest is to have the patsy kill himself or herself by committing “suicide”. Another favorite way is to take the patsy out in a thrilling high speed chase, which has the added benefit of drawing clueless people in through the MSM and gushingly promoting the police state

          ☞False Flag Formula #7: Shooter Leaves Manifesto
          In this day and age, writing a manifesto is a strange and anachronistic thing to do. Yet, for some strange reason, shooters’ manifestos seem to crop up an awful lot after mass shootings. Conveniently for the Controllers, these manifestos provide a perfect explanation for the official narrative, and help fill in the missing (non-existent) motive for the attack – which probably pushes those on the fence over into believing the Government’s version of the event. While the manifesto is not an element in every false flag operation, it is present in enough of them to be regarded as part of the false flag formula.

          ☞False Flag Formula #8: Evidence Gets Conveniently Destroyed

          ☞False Flag Formula #9: No Obvious Motive for the Mass Attack
          Have you ever wondered why there is no obvious motive in any of these mass shootings? Crimes are supposed to be solved on the merit of motive and opportunity, yet to hide the reality of a false flag op, the MSM just lies about the motive part, and chalks it up to a deranged shooter. Other times we are offered the flimsiest of motives, such as people going on an all-out rampage because they had a grievance with a co-worker.

          ☞False Flag Formula #10: Immediate Calls for Gun Control
          Gun control is obviously one of the key agendas behind all of these false flag mass shootings, since a disarmed population is far easier to exploit and manipulate than an armed one. It is an obvious aspect of the false flag formula. Sometimes gun control is even pushed in the immediate aftermath of the event when people are still in a highly emotional and suggestible state.

          The above 10 points are a useful outline of the false flag formula as it pertains to mass shootings with real victims, i.e. where real people die. However, ever since the surreal Sandy Hook event, which still contains many unanswered questions, we have entered the twilight zone of the false flag hoax. This is a term used to describe the false flag mass attacks where no one dies – where fake bodies, fake blood and fake victims are used instead. In this way, the entire operation is more tightly controlled and less messy. A hallmark of the false flag hoax is that the authorities never produce a credible piece of evidence showing an actual dead body of a victim.

          ☞The following 5 points relate to false flag hoaxes, and specifically to the people employed to pull them off – crisis actors. It is truly a testament to just how utterly fake our normal world is (the Matrix) that false flag ops have now descended to the level where we have to question whether the event even happened at all. There are organizations of crisis actors in the US (such as the IIF), and there is clear evidence crisis actors were used at Sandy Hook, Boston Marathon and many others. Government officials have been caught using the word “actor” to describe various players in these dramas; the MSM has even resorted to calling them actors too (it was one of the buzzwords of the recent San Bernardino mass shooting)☜

          ☞False Flag Formula #12: “Victims” Get Killed Twice
          The surreal quality of the false flag hoax reached point of absurdity when it was discovered that one of the “victims” was reportedly killed twice! We were told that Noah Pozner was one of the victims of the Sandy Hook shooting, yet his picture was also among those killed in a Pakistan Taliban attack. Apparently the recycling of fake victims is another part of the false flag formula.

          ☞False Flag Formula #13: Families of “Victims” Have Elite or Acting Backgrounds
          Is it just a coincidence that the families of mass shooting “victims” have either elite or acting backgrounds? .

          ☞False Flag Formula #14: Families of “Victims” Show Little to No Emotion, and Even Snigger and Laugh
          Luckily for truth seekers, the majority of crisis actors used in these false flag events are poor actors who are utterly unconvincing in the roles they play. The majority display little or no emotion after an alleged tragedy like losing a family member child to a random and violent mass shooting. It is true that humans do vary widely with emotional response and expression. However, with many of the crisis actors, judging by their reactions, it simply strains credibility too much to believe that they have just have been through a harrowing and traumatic ordeal. Given the range of possible reactions to a tragedy like losing a loved one