Texas Rural Church Shooting is a Terminally Corrupt Arch DHS Hoax
Updated, Monday, Nov. 6, 10:00 CST, again, Nov. 8, 10:00 CST
The arch-criminal DHS is at it again, now, with this supercilious, terminally inane rural Texas massacre hoax. Despite this, it is made out as if it really occurred, as if people were actually shot dead inside a church. What kind of funds were exchanged to gain the church’s cooperation? As well, what were the perks given to local law enforcement as well as the DA and sheriff’s office? Surely, significant money was exchanged in order to ensure the cooperation of all local parties.
How can dozens of people be slaughtered without the slightest degree of consequential panic and/or fear?
Make no mistake it is a vile fake, like all the others. Nothing that is claimed bears any resemblance of reality. All the players are paid actors.
It can be seen that it is all highly casual. No one is in a hurry about anything. No one is in the slightest degree of panic or shock.
Yet, it is said that the shooting was committed, once again, by a man bearing a long-gun, specifically an “AR-556 used in the shooting,” where, already, even the source was known, incredibly, from “an Academy Sports & Outdoors store in San Antonio,” of course, according to anonymous law officials.
Too, he was “ex-military,” a member of the “US Air Force,” said Air Force spokeswoman Ann Stefanek.
It is also stated that he was convicted of assault on his spouse and child, again, according to the Air Force.
What in God’s name is this supposed to represent? How is this evidence of a real, horrific, deadly shooting? Yet, people are fully bamboozled by it, fooled by such staged scenes to the extreme:
Even so, it’s always the same, actors galore, fake hugging, phony grief, fabricated heroes, and plenty of government agents; in fact, the area was swarming with them.
Then, too, there is the arch-fake hero. At one point it is said that he shot the (faux) gunman or at least wounded him, at another that, perhaps, he didn’t. Can’t the story-line agents make up their minds?
According to WOKY.com:
Bystander Johnny Langendorff watched as Devin Kelley traded gunfire with a neighbor who had grabbed his own rifle and engaged the gunman as he tried to flee the scene at First Baptist Church.
“I pulled up to the intersection where the shooting happened and I saw two men exchanging gunfire,” Langendorff said, according to the San Antonio Express-News. “The other gentleman said we needed to pursue (Kelley) because he shot up the church. So that’s what I did. I just acted.”
The pair followed Kelley until he lost control of his vehicle and ran off the road. Authorities were there moments later, according to KSAT.
It is still unclear if Kelley was shot by the armed resident or if it was self-inflicted.
Here is one of the purported dead, the pastor’s daughter. Why is her image so dark, with the background being far more bright? This photo appears to be anomalous.
NOTE: These images under review for assessing previously described defects.
Such a supercilious facial expression is commonly seen in digitally altered images, especially those offered in fake mass shootings. The photo is clearly corrupt with anomalies galore. The image has been artificially installed into the background: a poor job at obfuscation, indeed. Cut lines can be seen about both arms. The light is strong in the background. She could not be this dark if the image was natural. There are prominent cut lines across her nose. Clearly, the entire image is categorically corrupt, a cut-and-paste PhotoShop hack-job. It can even be seen that the background imagery bleeds into the image, as seen in the forehead and more:
The preacher is a fake dead person. No one knows were he is, but, surely, he is alive and well. His post-Las Vegas hoax words were not an omen but are, rather, proof of a scam and a hoax:
See, above, the psyop-promoting, arch-phony government installed pastor smirk as he says his supercilious words. Sure it is, right: absolutely. The Mossad might use box cutters and take over a jet, but, more likely, these treacherous elements would fabricate it, as they did on 9-11, using it as an Islamophobic lie.
Here is another fake dead person. Once again, the image appears to be contrived:
Why is there a bizarre-appearing brown patch between her two eyebrows? As well, as noted by a poster there are blocks of PhotoShop blur tool defects under the right and left eyes, demonstrating what appears to be the anomalous nature of this image.
This image represents hard image of a fake and a fraud, with clear cut lines and PhotoShop blur tool block defects abounding.
Regardless, no one was killed or injured. There is no evidence of any injuries or deaths.
The white man did it, the white supremacist. He went out and slaughtered fellow God-loving, church going white people. Could it get more inane than this?