The Vehicular Evidence of the Santa Barabara Shooting Hoax

UPDATED: May 29, 2014, 5:00 a.m. CST

The so-called Santa Barbara drive-by shooting spree is an complete confabulation. It represents yet another Zionist-concocted “lone wolf ” false flag event, yet another example of a person who seemingly did the impossible. So it is said that in the midst of a bustling metropolis a scrawny little man, Elliot Rodgers, killed six, while wounding 13. That’s nearly 20 people, a major feat. For that degree of slaughter and destruction there should surely be a plethora of evidence – a trail that law enforcement would investigate.

In fact, there would be a clear and evidential trail of evidence, clearly recognizable.

He did so, like the other ‘mass killers,’ without being stopped or even shot at by anyone. All the evidence went down with him, because in the end he killed himself.

It sounds like a movie plot, and that is precisely what it is.

Yet, that, too, would be a major issue: a major crime scene with plenty of the expected consequences. To kill himself would mean the suffering of a close-range blow, usually to the head. That means tissue splatter, including the splatter of fragmented bone plus brain tissue and a mass of blood. There would also assuredly be a blood-stained corpse.

Put simply, it would be a mess, a contaminated one, requiring the strategic presence of forensic and HAZMAT teams.

Also, there is the issue of the weapons and the residual ammo. Then, too, there are the shell casings.

Yet, all this is conspicously absent in this ‘mass shooting.’

The major buzz line for this scam is that it was “drive by.” This means that much of the killing and injuring arose from the car. Why else would it be called “drive by?”

The car itself would be a crime scene and it would be in the charge of forensics investigators as well as detectives. It would be taken away virtually immediately after the initial assessment and studied as a major element of the crime.

One of the first pictures available of the car after the purported shooting is as follows – what are the observations?

The car is well off the street, half on the sidewalk. The left tire is destroyed, with the wheel hub physically on the pavement, meaning that prior to its positioning it was impossible to drive. In general the car looks like a junker, a totaled vehicle from the scrap yard.

It is also seen that the red-colored plastic break light component is intact, lying in the middle of the sidewalk. It is if it was popped out purposely and placed as a kind of “strewn wreckage.” The front of the car, which should have been impacted the most according to the reports – the grill and front fender and top-center aspect of the hood  – is unmarred. This is despite the fact that it is butted up directly behind the SUV, although it did not crash into that vehicle.

Even so, since it couldn’t be driven at that point, how did it get up off the curb and onto the sidewalk?

Note the state of the windshield. It has suffered severe damage, which could only be the result of major impact. Yet, look at the direction of impact. It is punched in. In fact, it is punched in to such a degree that there is no glass anywhere to the outside, not even a fragment, notably on the hood. That is the opposite as expected from the impact of a person’s skull, which would have driven the glass outward.

It is simply the laws of physics. There is no disputing it. Note the fact that at this point there is no police tape. Yet, there is someone there shooting film. Furthermore, and this is highly revealing, there is a line of police tape in the far distance, indicating that this region was already blocked off:

Now comes the police tape, with a close-up view showing the intact front end and grates and a hood that has no damage in the center. In other words, there is no evidence that would account for impact of the front of this car against human bodies, bicycles, and more. Yet, it is acclaimed, for instance:

Does anyone see any evidence from the view of the front end of the impact to a human, especially one that would represent being “slammed?” Regardless, it has already been determined, here, that Gee is a fabricator and that by no means was he injured.

Here is another view showing the odd position of the vehicle on the sidewalk. Clearly, this would mean that if this car was really driven, it had jumped the curb at an angle that makes no sense. The bicycle is at a different angle/position; there is a vehicle between the two.

The position above the street is a major issue. With that amount of force necessary to deliver it there should be visible marks, even damage, to the concrete:

The position and condition of the bicycle is also noted. There is no damage to it whatsoever. How did it get there? Why isn’t it damaged? What happened to its rider? Too, note the police tape, documented earlier, in the distance. It was there before the photographer began his work. Surely, no one unauthorized is allowed upon the scene.

Yet, the students, though likely pre-authorized as a part of the drill, came to see it and offer a photo shoot, one of them, with the standard hand-to-the-face positioning, acting as if in shock, the rest seemingly indifferent with two of them working their phones. It now becomes even more evident that this is a Hollywood-style plot, not a real event. There is no shock, no awe – no despair – no adrenalin reaction – seen in anyone.

Our caption: the punched-in nature of the windshield is clear and absolute, meaning that as a part of the plot it was smashed inward by the scammers

This is a curious image. There is not a spec of glass found exteriorly yet the whipper blade is seen sitting on the hood. How did that get stripped off and place there? It could only be the result of human intervention.

Now, what can be seen? The airbag had been deployed. What did he strike with such impact to cause that deployment?  Too, people are given plenty of time to gawk at the imagery.

Then, as soon as he came to rest and was surrounded by police, so the Hollywood-style script goes, he blew up his head with a gun? Moreover, he did so in the car, after striking, purportedly, a police car?

What did he do, go into the back-seat to blow his brains out? There is not a drop of blood on that airbag. Or, is it a prop, too? Notice the state of the windshield, which is hard proof that it has been smashed in from outside-in. Too, notice the crisis actors in the background, including the woman working her cell phone. Too, why is Mr. Green Uniform on the phone? Does he have an update for the movie producer?

Once again, there is not a drop of blood on that glaringly white air bag, a physical impossibility in the event of a real shot to the head at close range. Note, too, that in the previous image for the purposes of the camera-shoot the rear lights have been left on. It can also be seen clearly that there is no marring of the cement side walk and no marks of any kind that would account for the raw metal of the right front wheel against it. There are no skid marks of any kind. That car has merely been placed there.

What is also seen is what is purportedly a corpse, that is under the yellow tarp. What are they doing leaving it there in the hot California sun? If it is a real dead person, why not remove it? There is no major investigative police or forensic presence: no detectives. Why not call the coroner and have it removed?

It’s just a tarp. There is obviously no body there. The man shoots himself at close range with a powerful handgun, and he just left there to rot for the purposes of publicity? Who in a million years would believe it?

The image was cut and then rotated counterclockwise. Clearly, there is no corpse in that tarp:

The whitish-colored round element could be a crisis dummy head. Yet, it is not attached to anything.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/deranged-santa-barbara-california-killer-tied-premeditated-youtube-video-reports-article-1.1804354#ixzz32k2v3glm

http://www.smh.com.au/world/father-slams-us-gun-lobby-over-death-of-son-in-elliot-rodgers-santa-barbara-shooting-spree-20140525-zrnft.html#ixzz32jwHpBKo

http://www.smh.com.au/world/father-slams-us-gun-lobby-over-death-of-son-in-elliot-rodgers-santa-barbara-shooting-spree-20140525-zrnft.html

ttp://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/california-killings-timeline-how-elliot-rodger-planned–and-carried-out–his-killing-spree-9432806.html