Wax Dummies Used Instead of Dead Cops in Dallas Shooting Hoax?
What is the notoriously corrupt Dallas police department up to this time, that is regarding the purported shooting of 11 Dallas police officers, five of which reportedly died? It couldn’t be real. The story lines have changed continuously. Consider the interviews with the police chief himself. He smirks, while showing no signs of shock or grief at the loss of any officers.
It’s all a side-show, a mere circus: an absolute fraud.
This would indicate that no one died. That would demonstrate that the funerals themselves are fake as well as any imagery, what little there is, of actual wounded or dead people.
Yet, it is said that five cops really did die, and there were real memorials and funerals for them, or so it seemed:
The dead officers were Brent Thompson, a Dallas Area Rapid Transit officer; Zamarripa, 32, a U.S. Navy veteran who was deployed to Bahrain as part of the Iraq War effort; Michael Krol, whose lifelong dream was to be a cop; Lorne Ahrens, 48, who was remembered as a great co-worker; and Michael Smith, 55, described as a devoted family man and father of two daughters…
There is in this Dallas scam virtually no imagery of anyone who is incapacitated, who is wounded: who is shot in the back, abdomen, or anywhere else.
Consider the case of officer Lorne Ahrens. He’s dead, right: shot presumably in the back. If so, the, should not his wife be devastating? Instead, she is bursting with energy, filled to the brim with happiness and smiles:
So, then, once again, what of the funerals? It is clear from the following imagery that his death was belittled. Then, how could he be truly deceased? Not at all, he is only “half dead.”
Caption: PhotoShop used in the above to create the macabre, the ‘half-dead’-marked photo with a fake arm and red matter added through photographic manipulation, as if making a mere joke of death.
“Half-dead” would mean he is not dead at all but is only faking it. Moreover, PhotoShop was used to create this belittling picture. It was even placed on an easel at the funeral. Who finds this plausible in the real death of a dedicated cop? The wife isn’t the only one to joke about his untimely death. His fellow officers have also done so, right at his funeral/memorial:
This same officer was seen on the staging site acting as a hoaxing agent, as demonstrated by the following screen-captures:
Here, she appears to be smiling when presumably off camera, but that changes fairly suddenly:
The officer is clearly staging this for the camera-shoot. Then, how can her eulogy be regarded as anything other than an extensionof such staging?
Is this Mr. Ahrens or merely a dapper cadaver dummy made to appear as if a dying or dead cop?
Here is another image of what is supposed to be a slain policeman. Notice there appears to be a cop in the squad car. Why are they leaving him (it) there? Why doesn’t anyone care enough to drag him (it) out of the line of fire into one of the cars? Too, the cops are actually in the cars. Why don’t they remove their ‘fallen’ comrade from the danger zone?
How is this anything other than a dummy?
Furthermore, why are there no bullet holes in any of the cars? Why is there no blood visible? Why was this not turned into a crime scene if such a cop was really shot dead in that position?
No one can say for sure from such imagery, but it surely appears suspect. What about this, what is it? Is it a dummy? Or, is it a policeman faking it? Notice the position of the legs. How is that natural?
With all those policeman around, many of whom had long-guns, how did one man pull this off? How did he kill and wound so many without himself being taken out? Nevertheless, if this was really the scene of fatal shootings of police officers, why was there no crime scene? Why was there no HAZMAT and/or forensics activity at the site? There could be no real deaths and, therefore, it’s a hoax. That surely explains the imagery seen, here, as ex-president Bush switches from dancing in glee, then acting as if he is suffering in grief or remorse.
What did Michael (aka Michelle) Obama say to him at that point, enough to get him to switch over? Was she telling him, ‘Cool it, man; act like you’re grieving, not like you’re having a party.’
He does, though, like the others, have that arch-psyops, gun-control ribbon, that green ribbon pinned to his lapel.
Even so, a corpse can be readily faked. In the Orlando scam this was faked:
That is absolutely a wax dummy. So is this. Yet, they are both made to be realistic. It’s a common feat by the terminally corrupt Zionist agents associated with the Obama clique.
So, then, is the following imagery real, or is it a wax fake, like the others? It looks more wax than real:
Regardless, it must be thoroughly analyzed, since even those closest to him, as well as fellow officers and government officials, are making a joke out of it:
What about his hands? Are they made out of wax, too?
Orlando vs. Vincent Price in the wax museum vs. Lorne Ahrens. No wonder 50 Dallas cops just quit the force, that is just prior to the launching of this scam. Does anyone remember this from the Charleston shooting hoax? It, too, is a wax dummy:
NOTE: Wax dummies were used in the Charleston and Orlando mass shooting hoaxes. This a commonly used element by the hoax scam artists to create a sense of reality. It may be recalled that after the arch-Zionist-orchestrated Charleston race-baiting shooting hoax Obama himself made a trip to Hollywood, meeting with Steven Spielberg, among others.
In this hoax, though, the criminal minds were more cautious. There is never a clear view of the wax/fake elements placed in the casket. Even so, where is the body in this case? Why is there no torso obviously present or anything else?
It truly all is a stage, and without real, live imagery or videographic evidence proving this man was shot, then, it is fake until proven otherwise. Regardless, why is the Zionist-controlled media attempting to portray the son as if agonizing in grief, even saying he is breaking “down,” when he is obviously not and is, rather, doing the opposite? Is this not an attempted cover-up?
See also this video (Dana W), credit to this worker and other brave videographers, for
confirming the degree of the scam and the full-fledged arch-lying, in this case, the fake bombing attributed to a mere robot, where it was claimed that a pound of C4 was detonated in the building: