Is the Weiss Supermarket Store Shooting a Hoax?
With revelations from one of our posters, updated, June 11, 2017
It is not plausible that the Weiss Supermarket shooting plus suicide is a real event. It is perfect timing as a cover-up for real terrorist attacks occurring, for instance, in Islamic Iran and also Iraq, among other regions in the Middle East. In the case of the Weiss issue evidence of staging and falsification can readily be seen. In contrast, this is not seen in real attacks and actual bombings. There is no fake crying seen in actual fatal events. To actually fake tears and to falsify crying for purposes of media elements is major evidence that the event in question was fabricated.
It is said that the purported shooter spent some “90 minutes” preparing for the crime through moving skids about with a pallet jack and doing all other sorts of aberrant behavior. Wouldn’t the others who are stated to have been there have noticed and been alert to his actions?
Moreover, the Weiss issue is being leveraged to create fear by the media, also to create a ground swell in regard to gun rights and the safety of open availability of guns. For instance, media elements are interviewing people asking them if they are, now, fearful of guns and also merely entering, for instance, a supermarket.
Yet, it is the staging of grief or crying which is usually the give-away. For instance, this woman is seen to be staging grief. Prior to this the women were seen in the following image, stated to be in relation to their going to work at 6:00 a.m.:
Then, it is said, they were given the news: just in time for media imagery. The woman with the baseball cap sort of catches and actually pulls down the woman in grey downward towards her, as is seen in the video.
Moreover, she does all this while holding a cigarette:
This particular element is definitely staged, specifically for the camera-shoot.
It seems, now, that the new pattern is to stage the standard ‘disgruntled worker and colleague’ mass shooting events. It should be expected that more of these will be staged. Regardless, this scene is clearly done for the camera-shoot and has no element of reality.
Here is another example of this, occurring at the vigil. Now, this is a grand distraction. There are real hostilities and attacks being committed against the common people, primarily against Islamic people in the Middle East, while these facts draw much attention: as well as much funding from the bamboozled general public.
This scene occurs after the hugging. Notice the furtive glance of the blonde woman. Why is the young woman on the left faking it as if she is wiping away tears? Why are these people so happy at the thought of four people, friends and colleagues, shot to death. As well, where are the actual loved ones? Why are there no relatives to be found on-site during the vigil?
It is said that the bomb squad came in the morning after the ‘event.’ That makes no sense. If there was a risk, it would have been there right away. Yet, this propane tank, placed against the brick wall, is offered as evidence, which makes no sense to any degree. It is also said that the shot up propane tanks inside. Then, what is this one doing on the outside next to the car?
Even so, why would he leave it there if the intent was to blow up people in the supermarket?
The only part of the of the official story that makes sense is the following statement, a Freudian slip, perhaps, by one of the officers in-charge:
It makes no sense that this individual could upload all these images and threats: without consequence. Actual murderers and terrorists rarely if ever flag what they are about to do, usually doing so through stealth, as occurred in Tehran where the terrorists came upon their victims by surprise, also possibly dressed as women. If they would have made themselves more obvious, these criminal elements would not have been so ‘successful’ in their murder spree.
Regardless, if it would have happened as advertised, there would have surely been a blood-bath, and if he would have turned that gun upon himself and blown himself up at close range, the situation would not have been pretty. That would necessitate the presence of forensics and HAZMAT. No HAZMAT elements have been observed on the scene.
If there were four dead and a gunman lying dead with a self-inflicted gunshot wound, why are these men, at the onset of the investigation, having nothing to do but to mill about and stand outside the scene?
As well, consider the absolute lack of any emergency response, in this case relative to the ambulance, which is setting at considerable distance from the entrance:
Someone was there very early on, as well, shooting the following image, just as the vehicles pulled up:
It is also said by the newschannels that the following reporter was there on-site as the police rolled in:
State police: bomb squad on way to check out car at Weis on Route 29 in Eaton Township, Wyoming County. Heavy police presence
Now, it is said, there was an actual surviving witness inside the store. According to local news journals this is the kind of elements that revolve around such a purported surviving witness:
DALLAS — The sole survivor of Thursday’s supermarket shootings said alleged gunman Randy Robert Stair glared at her at one point during his rampage, but for some reason decided to spare her, court records show.
Kristin Newell told troopers Stair chose to walk away instead of shoot her.
Meanwhile, an actress who voiced a cartoon character created by Stair said he revealed his plans to her in an email he sent less than an hour before the killings.
Laura Faverty, however, didn’t see that email until hours later because her phone wasn’t charged, the Associated Press reports. She found out what happened later while watching news reports.
So, there are at least two actors involved, the purported shooter himself and also Ms. Faverty.
There is also the issue of the fake dead. Now, how does the following commentary make any sense?
There was all sorts of communication, so it is claimed, just minutes before the shooting.
Who is Ms. Brong? The mother of a six year-old, so it is reported, this is one of the few images available.
Of note, at the vigil no one is making any commentary about her tiny child. For instance, her landlady mentions the purported death but nothing about the child’s status:
CRANTON — “Please tell me you are ok”
Bonnie Burridge sent the text at 6:43 a.m. after hearing about a shooting at the Weis Market in Eaton Twp., Wyoming County, where her tenant of two years, Victoria Todd Brong, worked.
She waited for a response. It never came.
When she saw Brong’s car was not in the driveway, she knew: The 26-year-old mother was dead.
NOTE: how did she know this for that, for instance, if this was a real shooting, that she wasn’t merely injured or, perhaps, escaped? Who is taking care of the child?
It was all witnessed, so it is claimed, by a survivor, Kristin Newell. She got out, it is said. Yet, how did she do so? It was all supposed to be barricaded:
Newell managed to escape the store, even though Stair barricaded the exits.
Another purportedly dead individual is Mr. Brian Hayes. Why isn’t his family at the vigil? Moreover, according to a former girlfriend he is a man who likes to play jokes:
Hayes was a “prankster,” who took great delight in embarrassing her daughter from a prior relationship, she said.
Here is another type of prank he would commonly commit:
He also loved to rile her in public, loudly asking which product she wanted as they stood in the feminine hygiene section of a store.
Why is no one crying and in shock? Where are the children and babies? Then, it would seem that the shooting itself is a prank.
As well, there was no HAZMAT on scene. The police tape was taken down by the next day. There was no forensic investigation.